[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: add -libvirt-caps option for libvirt to sto

From: Daniel P. Berrange
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: add -libvirt-caps option for libvirt to stop parsing help output
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:07:25 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:47:23PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:47:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > The help output is going to change dramatically for 0.13.  We've spent too 
> > long
> > waiting for a perfect solution to capabilities handling and the end loser is
> > the direct consumer of QEMU because the help output is awful.
> > 
> > I will not apply any patches that change help output until 0.13 development
> > opens up.  This should give libvirt adequate time to implement support for
> > dealing with this new option.
> I completely agree with this. We have spent far too long making do with
> "help output" and its about time we finish with this once & for all.
> I'm assuming you mean the 1.3 release here. If so I'll agree that it
> is an acceptable plan to change help output at the start of the 1.3
> release.
> This gives us enough time to agree on what todo to support apps needing
> to query QEMU.
> > This capabilities set comes directly from libvirt's source code so it's 
> > entirely
> > adequate for libvirt's purposes.  We can still explore more sophisticated
> > approaches that are more general purpose but the help output will be 
> > changing.
> While I appreciate what you're trying todo here, I think this would be a
> serious mistake on many counts, and even be incorrect in some ways.
>  - It ignores the needs of other apps using QEMU. In particular Richard
>    Jones has frequently requested a way to detect QEMU capabilities
>    to satisfy libguestfs. I think it is unreasonable to expect libguestfs
>    to use the libvirt capabilities described here. Likewise other apps
>  - This is just a point in time snapshot of what libvirt currently uses
>    from QEMU. If, for example, someone provided a patch to libvirt to
>    support the bluetooth devices we'd be stuck, because although QEMU
>    already supports bluetooth, this is not expressed in any of the
>    caps libvirt already has.
>  - Not all of this information actually comes from the help output.
>    A bunch of it is stuff we detect from '-device ?' and
>    '-device name,?'. Although, (AFAIR) no one has objections to use
>    parsing the -device output because it is much better defined &
>    stable than -help, I think we could use some improvement to make
>    the parsing 100% long term maintainable by QEMU/apps. Similarly
>    we do  '-cpu ?' and '-machine ?'.  Some of the caps are set based
>    on the machine architecture, or QEMU version.
>  - Some of the caps are set based on what libvirt is actually
>    able to handle from a command line generation POV, so having
>    QEMU report these unconditionally is misleading/wrong. It is
>    not about what QEMU supports, it is about what libvirt is able
>    to cope with.
>  - In the future some of the caps may be describing supported
>    monitor commands, detected via 'query-commands' QMP cmd.
>  - Users of libvirt are asking us to expose information about
>    what QEMU supports, in particular wrt to devices, but also
>    other aspects of configuration.
> A long time back I proposed a '-capabilities' command line argument
> for querying QEMU.
>   https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-06/msg00921.html
> There was a long discussion about this & many aspects of it were
> disliked. In retrospect I agree with many of the comments, and
> am glad we didn't adopt this. I think, however, there is a merit
> in trying something vaguely related again, but with some key
> differences. Basically I'd sum up my new idea as "just use QMP".
>  * No new command line arguments like -capabilities
>  * libvirt invokes something like
>      $QEMUBINARY -qmp CHARDEV -nodefault -nodefconfig -nographics
>  * libvirt then runs a number of  QMP commands to find out
>    what it needs to know. I'd expect the following existing
>    commands would be used
>      - query-version             - already supported
>      - query-commands            - already supported
>      - query-events              - already supported
>      - query-kvm                 - already supported
>      - qom-{list,list-types,get} - already supported
>      - query-spice/vnc           - already supported
>    And add the following new commands
>      - query-devices             - new, -device ?, and/or -device NAME,? data 
> in QMP
>      - query-machines            - new, -M ? in QMP
>      - query-cpu-types           - new, -cpu ? in QMP
> The above would take care of probably 50% of the current libvirt
> capabilities probing, including a portion of the -help stuff. Then
> there is all the rest of the crap we detect from the -help. We could
> just take the view, that "as of 1.2", we assume everything we previously
> detected is just available by default, and thus don't need to probe
> it.  For stuff that is QOM based, I expect we'll be able to detect new
> features in the future using the qom-XXX monitor commands. For stuff
> that is non-qdev, and non-qom, libvirt can just do a plain version
> number check, unless we decide there is specific info worth exposing
> via other new 'query-XXX' monitor commands.
> So in summary, as of 1.2 QEMU, libvirt would
>   - Remove all use of -help, and other -XXXX command line args
>     for detecting capabilities
>   - Use -qmp and issue commands above to detect whatever it
>     can
>   - Any other existing capabilities are just "enable by default"
>     for QEMU >= 1.2
>   - Detect future stuff via existing monitor commands, otherwise
>     just do it by QEMU version number.
> So in terms of QEMU work, all I'm asking is to be allowed to
> implement the query-devices, query-machines & query-cpu-types
> QMP monitor commands. I'll happily do this work myself, if it
> brings an end to the -help madness.

Oh, if it is possible to get this data via QOM commands already,
or it can be easily made to work with QOM commands, then obviously
I wouldn't ask for these new query-XXX commands.

|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]