qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 04/12] hw/sd.c: favour SD card type (SDSC or


From: Igor Mitsyanko
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 04/12] hw/sd.c: favour SD card type (SDSC or SDHC) when performing erase
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:19:59 +0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0

On 07/31/2012 01:29 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Igor Mitsyanko <address@hidden> writes:

Standard capacity cards SDSC use byte unit address while SDHC and SDXC Cards use
block unit address (512 bytes) when setting ERASE_START and ERASE_END with CMD32
and CMD33, we have to account for this.

Signed-off-by: Igor Mitsyanko <address@hidden>
---
  hw/sd.c |    6 ++++--
  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/sd.c b/hw/sd.c
index d0674d5..f7aa580 100644
--- a/hw/sd.c
+++ b/hw/sd.c
@@ -482,8 +482,10 @@ static void sd_erase(SDState *sd)
          return;
      }
- start = sd_addr_to_wpnum(sd->erase_start);
-    end = sd_addr_to_wpnum(sd->erase_end);
+    start = sd_addr_to_wpnum(sd->ocr & (1 << 30) ?
+            (uint64_t)sd->erase_start * 512 : sd->erase_start);
+    end = sd_addr_to_wpnum(sd->ocr & (1 << 30) ?
+            (uint64_t)sd->erase_end * 512 : sd->erase_end);
      sd->erase_start = 0;
      sd->erase_end = 0;
      sd->csd[14] |= 0x40;
Is this a bug fix?

If yes, I recommend to state that clearly in the subject, say "hw/sd.c:
Fix erase for high capacity cards".

Yes it is, I'll change subject in next version then.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]