qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2 v3] target-i386: refactor reset handling and


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2 v3] target-i386: refactor reset handling and move it into cpu.c
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:19:26 -0500
User-agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+93~ged93d79 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Andreas Färber <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 01.08.2012 22:02, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> Andreas Färber <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>>> Am 01.08.2012 20:25, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>>> Andreas Färber <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Am 01.08.2012 17:43, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>>>>> Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> v2:
>>>>>>>   ommited moving of x86_cpu_realize() from cpu_x86_init() to 
>>>>>>> pc_new_cpu(),
>>>>>>>   to keep cpu_init implementation in -softmmu and -user targets the same
>>>>>>>   in single place and maintanable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> v3:
>>>>>>>   reuse cpu_is_bsp() rather than open code check if apicbase has BSP 
>>>>>>> bit set
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tree for testing:
>>>>>>>   https://github.com/imammedo/qemu/tree/x86_reset_v3
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> comiple & run tested with x86_64-linux-user, x86_64-softmmu targets
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Igor Mammedov (2):
>>>>>>>   target-i386: move cpu halted decision into x86_cpu_reset
>>>>>>>   target-i386: move cpu_reset and reset callback to cpu.c
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Applied all.  Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> So do you intend to refactor all machines accordingly or leave it
>>>>> inconsistent now?
>>>>
>>>> Are you asking me?
>>>>
>>>> No, I have no intention of touching any other machine.  We're not going
>>>> to limit cleaning up target-i386 unless every other machine is cleaned
>>>> up too.
>>>>
>>>> Reset logic should live in the CPU.  Seems like a no-brainer to me.
>>>
>>> Yes, I'm asking you, since you replied and applied the series without
>>> responding to my review comment on patch 2/2. You probably applied it
>>> locally before reading my comments but then I would still have expected
>>> a reply on how to proceed in light of those comments:
>> 
>> No, I saw your comment, although I had already decided to apply it by
>> then.
>
> If you did read it then you forgot my Reviewed-by on 1/2. :(

Oh, sorry, I switched to a new patch apply script.  Maybe it's not
working correctly.  I'll look into it.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Andreas
>
> -- 
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]