Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/6] virtio/console: Add a failback for unstealable pipe buffer

[Avi Kivity]

On 08/09/2012 12:55 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Thu) 09 Aug 2012 [18:24:58], Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2012/08/09 18:03), Amit Shah wrote:
>> > On (Tue) 24 Jul 2012 [11:37:18], Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
>> >> From: Masami Hiramatsu <address@hidden>
>> >>
>> >> Add a failback memcpy path for unstealable pipe buffer.
>> >> If buf->ops->steal() fails, virtio-serial tries to
>> >> copy the page contents to an allocated page, instead
>> >> of just failing splice().
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <address@hidden>
>> >> Cc: Amit Shah <address@hidden>
>> >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <address@hidden>
>> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <address@hidden>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >>  drivers/char/virtio_console.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> >>  1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
>> >> index fe31b2f..911cb3e 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
>> >> @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ static int pipe_to_sg(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, 
>> >> struct pipe_buffer *buf,
>> >>                   struct splice_desc *sd)
>> >>  {
>> >>   struct sg_list *sgl = sd->u.data;
>> >> - unsigned int len = 0;
>> >> + unsigned int offset, len;
>> >>  
>> >>   if (sgl->n == MAX_SPLICE_PAGES)
>> >>           return 0;
>> >> @@ -807,9 +807,31 @@ static int pipe_to_sg(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, 
>> >> struct pipe_buffer *buf,
>> >>  
>> >>           len = min(buf->len, sd->len);
>> >>           sg_set_page(&(sgl->sg[sgl->n]), buf->page, len, buf->offset);
>> >> -         sgl->n++;
>> >> -         sgl->len += len;
>> >> + } else {
>> >> +         /* Failback to copying a page */
>> >> +         struct page *page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
>> > 
>> > I prefer zeroing out the page.  If there's not enough data to be
>> > filled in the page, the remaining data can be leaked to the host.
>> 
>> Yeah, it is really easy to fix that.
>> But out of curiosity, would that be really a problem?
>> I guess that host can access any guest page if need. If that
>> is right, is that really insecure to leak randomly allocated
>> unused page to the host?
> 
> I'm not sure if there is a way to really attack, but just something I
> had thought about: the host kernel can access any guest page, that's
> not something we can prevent.
> 
> However, if qemu is restricted from accessing guest pages, and the
> guest shares this page with qemu for r/w purposes via the virtio
> channel, a qemu exploit can expose guest data to host userspace.
> 
> I agree this is completely theoretical; can someone else with more
> insight confirm or deny my apprehensions?

qemu can read and write any guest page (for the guest it controls).


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function