[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] slirp: Fix spelling in comment (enought -> enough,
From: |
Stefan Weil |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] slirp: Fix spelling in comment (enought -> enough, insure -> ensure) |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:57:38 +0200 |
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
---
As a non native speaker, I feel that 'ensure' is better here than 'insure'.
Could a native speaker please confirm that?
Thanks,
Stefan
slirp/ip_icmp.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/slirp/ip_icmp.h b/slirp/ip_icmp.h
index 1a1af91..be4426b 100644
--- a/slirp/ip_icmp.h
+++ b/slirp/ip_icmp.h
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ struct icmp {
/*
* Lower bounds on packet lengths for various types.
- * For the error advice packets must first insure that the
- * packet is large enought to contain the returned ip header.
+ * For the error advice packets must first ensure that the
+ * packet is large enough to contain the returned ip header.
* Only then can we do the check to see if 64 bits of packet
* data have been returned, since we need to check the returned
* ip header length.
--
1.7.10
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] slirp: Fix spelling in comment (enought -> enough, insure -> ensure),
Stefan Weil <=