[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication
From: |
Dietmar Maurer |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jan 2013 07:09:10 +0000 |
> > Venti is an example of an existing system where hash collisions were
> > ignored because the probability is so low. See 3.1. Choice of Hash
> > Function section:
> >
> > http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/venti/venti.html
>
>
> If you believe that it's 'extremely low', then please provide either:
>
> * experimental evidence to prove your claim
> * an insurance underwriter who will pay-out if data is lost due to a hash
> collision.
>
> What I have heard so far is a lot of theoretical posturing and no experimental
> evidence.
Venti is a well-known system, in use for more than 10 years - isn't that enough
experimental evidence?
- Dietmar
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication, Troy Benjegerdes, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication, Benoît Canet, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication, ronnie sahlberg, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication, Benoît Canet, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication, Troy Benjegerdes, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication, ronnie sahlberg, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2013/01/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication, Troy Benjegerdes, 2013/01/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication,
Dietmar Maurer <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2013/01/04
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V4 00/30] QCOW2 deduplication, Benoît Canet, 2013/01/03