[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] Support mips64/mipsn32-linux-user
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] Support mips64/mipsn32-linux-user |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:57:05 +0000 |
On 11 February 2013 15:45, Richard Henderson <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2013-02-11 01:59, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Eight patches out of ten have no commit message beyond the
>> one-liner summary...
> Ok, so? Most of the patches are microscopic,
> and do exactly what the summary says.
Well, just to start with, I looked at patch 1 and thought
"why is it ok to delete these without it making something
fail to compile?". That's the kind of question I tend to
expect to be addressed in a commit message. Patches without
good commit messages are like code without comments: they
work, but they're more effort to review because the
author never explains the 'why' of anything. One or two
patches might have one-liner commit messages, sure, but 80%
of a ten-patch series?
Sure, to some extent this is personal style preferences, but
that's generally fair game in patch review. As always with
review comments, you are free to ignore them :-)
-- PMM