Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] migration: drop is_write complications

[Juan Quintela]

Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> Il 09/04/2013 13:42, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
>>> > @@ -556,11 +557,7 @@ static void qemu_fill_buffer(QEMUFile *f)
>>> >      int len;
>>> >      int pending;
>>> >  
>>> > -    if (!f->ops->get_buffer)
>>> > -        return;
>> Why are we removing this test?  this has nothing to do with the is_write
>> removal?
>
> This test assumes that it makes sense to call qemu_get_byte on a
> write-opened QEMUFile.  This is not true anymore after this patch.
> After eliminating is_write, the right thing to do is abort.


But this would not abort,  it would do a segmenation fault!

I would not complain to a:

assert(!f->ops->get_buffer);

It would told us from where we got the "invalid" call,  but this removal
will change a "silent fail" (that I don't like either) to a segmentation
fault (that is even worse).

Later,  Juan.