qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/11] memory: Add iommu map/unmap notifiers


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/11] memory: Add iommu map/unmap notifiers
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 23:02:39 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4

Il 14/05/2013 19:15, Alex Williamson ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 19:13 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>> > This patch adds a NotifierList to MemoryRegions which represent IOMMUs
>> > allowing other parts of the code to register interest in mappings or
>> > unmappings from the IOMMU.  All IOMMU implementations will need to call
>> > memory_region_notify_iommu() to inform those waiting on the notifier list,
>> > whenever an IOMMU mapping is made or removed.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
>> > ---
>> >  hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c  |    8 ++++++++
>> >  include/exec/memory.h |    7 +++++++
>> >  memory.c              |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
>> >  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c
>> > index 07a6307..6d40485 100644
>> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c
>> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c
>> > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static target_ulong put_tce_emu(sPAPRTCETable *tcet, 
>> > target_ulong ioba,
>> >                                  target_ulong tce)
>> >  {
>> >      sPAPRTCE *tcep;
>> > +    IOMMUTLBEntry entry;
>> >  
>> >      if (ioba >= tcet->window_size) {
>> >          hcall_dprintf("spapr_vio_put_tce on out-of-bounds IOBA 0x"
>> > @@ -204,6 +205,13 @@ static target_ulong put_tce_emu(sPAPRTCETable *tcet, 
>> > target_ulong ioba,
>> >      tcep = tcet->table + (ioba >> SPAPR_TCE_PAGE_SHIFT);
>> >      tcep->tce = tce;
>> >  
>> > +    entry.iova = ioba & ~SPAPR_TCE_PAGE_MASK;
>> > +    entry.translated_addr = tce & ~SPAPR_TCE_PAGE_MASK;
>> > +    entry.addr_mask = SPAPR_TCE_PAGE_MASK;
>> > +    entry.perm[0] = !!(tce & SPAPR_TCE_RO);
>> > +    entry.perm[1] = !!(tce & SPAPR_TCE_WO);
> I really wish these perms were addressed by #defines (ie.
> perm[READ]/perm[WRITE]) or explicitly named.
> 

I will make it a 2-bit field.

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]