[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-05-28

From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-05-28
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 15:27:08 -0500
User-agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+77~g661dcf8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Jordan Justen <address@hidden> writes:

> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
>> In terms of creating a FAT module, the most likely source would seem to
>> be the kernel code and since that's GPL, I don't think it's terribly
>> avoidable to end up with a GPL'd uefi implementation.
> Why would OpenBSD not be a potential source?
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/msdosfs/

If someone is going to do it, that's fine.

But if me, it's going to be a GPL base.  Actually, enabling GPL
contributions to OVMF is a major motivating factor for me in this whole


Anthony Liguori

> We have a half-done ext2 fs from GSoC2011 that started with OpenBSD.
> https://github.com/the-ridikulus-rat/Tianocore_Ext2Pkg
>> If that's inevitable, then we're wasting effort by rewriting stuff under
>> a BSD license.
>> Regards,
>> Anthony Liguori

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]