[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/5] exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_s
From: |
Richard Henderson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/5] exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_space_rw |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:05:40 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
On 07/17/2013 12:56 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> It is:
>
> cpu_outb
> -> address_space_write
> -> address_space_rw
> -> io_mem_write
> -> memory_region_dispatch_write
> -> access_with_adjusted_size
>
> memory_access_size is just returning a length that makes sense when
> passed to io_mem_write and ultimately to access_with_adjusted_size.
Ah, ok. Sorry for being dense about the full context here.
I agree ignoring impl.minimum is ok here, since a real assert ought
to be lower down in access_with_adjusted_size, right before actually
dispatching to the device code.
r~
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/5] exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_space_rw, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/5] exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_space_rw, Anthony Liguori, 2013/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/5] exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_space_rw, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/5] exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_space_rw, Richard Henderson, 2013/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/5] exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_space_rw, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/5] exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_space_rw, Richard Henderson, 2013/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/5] exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_space_rw, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/5] exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_space_rw,
Richard Henderson <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 3/5] exec: Support 64-bit operations in address_space_rw, Anthony Liguori, 2013/07/17
[Qemu-devel] [PULL 4/5] hw/alpha: Drop latch_tmp hack, Richard Henderson, 2013/07/14
[Qemu-devel] [PULL 5/5] hw/alpha: Use SRM epoch, Richard Henderson, 2013/07/14