[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390 cpu hotplug
From: |
Luiz Capitulino |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390 cpu hotplug |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Sep 2013 09:12:02 -0400 |
On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 15:04:17 +0200
Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 04.09.2013 14:56, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> > On Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:45:44 +0200
> > Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> For the HMP patch I am waiting on feedback from Igor once he returns
> >> from his vacation and, if there are no objections, would like to see
> >> that patch go through Luiz' queue since unrelated to s390x.
> >
> > I don't remember seeing that patch, I was CC'ed?
It should be good then :)
>
> Originally no, but you added a Reviewed-by after I CC'ed you. :)
>
> Apart from me not being familiar with the HMP infrastructure, I was
> wondering if there was a reason why this wasn't done from the start.
>
> So we don't have some only-new-QMP-commands policy
Not sure what you meant, but what is usually not accepted are
new HMP-only commands.
> and people are
> encouraged to implement an HMP command when they do a QMP command?
If the new command makes sense in HMP, yes they're.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390 cpu hotplug, Andreas Färber, 2013/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390 cpu hotplug, Alexander Graf, 2013/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390 cpu hotplug, Andreas Färber, 2013/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390 cpu hotplug, Alexander Graf, 2013/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390 cpu hotplug, Andreas Färber, 2013/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390 cpu hotplug, Jason J. Herne, 2013/09/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390 cpu hotplug, Andreas Färber, 2013/09/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v3] s390 cpu hotplug, Michael Mueller, 2013/09/16