qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: remove explicit check to 64K ioport size


From: Hervé Poussineau
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: remove explicit check to 64K ioport size
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 09:52:55 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

Michael S. Tsirkin a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:58:44PM +0200, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
This check is useless, as bigger addresses will be ignored when
added to 'io' MemoryRegion, which has a size of 64K.

However, some architectures don't use the 'io' MemoryRegion, like
the alpha and versatile platforms. They create a PCI I/O region
bigger than 64K, so let them handle PCI I/O BARs in the higher range.

Signed-off-by: Hervé Poussineau <address@hidden>
---
 hw/pci/pci.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
index d00682e..a8e2b29 100644
--- a/hw/pci/pci.c
+++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
@@ -1028,8 +1028,7 @@ static pcibus_t pci_bar_address(PCIDevice *d,
         }
         new_addr = pci_get_long(d->config + bar) & ~(size - 1);
         last_addr = new_addr + size - 1;
-        /* NOTE: we have only 64K ioports on PC */
-        if (last_addr <= new_addr || new_addr == 0 || last_addr > UINT16_MAX) {
+        if (last_addr <= new_addr || new_addr == 0) {
             return PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED;
         }
         return new_addr;
--
1.7.10.4

We still didn't fix the overlap for PCI BARs properly
so it looks like the following is needed on top.
Could you please check whether this works for you on versatile/alpha?

Yes, alpha and versatile still seem to work.

Hervé


diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
index d452135..3118854 100644
--- a/hw/pci/pci.c
+++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
@@ -1028,7 +1028,10 @@ static pcibus_t pci_bar_address(PCIDevice *d,
         }
         new_addr = pci_get_long(d->config + bar) & ~(size - 1);
         last_addr = new_addr + size - 1;
-        if (last_addr <= new_addr || new_addr == 0) {
+        /* Check if BAR is being sized explicitly.
+         * TODO: make priorities correct and remove this work around.
+         */
+        if (last_addr <= new_addr || new_addr == 0 || last_addr >= UINT32_MAX) 
{
             return PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED;
         }
         return new_addr;





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]