Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/38] msix: split msix_free from msix_uninit

[Paolo Bonzini]

Il 17/09/2013 11:21, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:33:01PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/misc/vfio.c         |  1 +
>>  hw/net/vmxnet3.c       |  3 +++
>>  hw/pci/msix.c          | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>>  hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c |  1 +
>>  include/hw/pci/msix.h  |  1 +
>>  5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/misc/vfio.c b/hw/misc/vfio.c
>> index a1c08fb..1311d0e 100644
>> --- a/hw/misc/vfio.c
>> +++ b/hw/misc/vfio.c
>> @@ -2144,6 +2144,7 @@ static void vfio_teardown_msi(VFIODevice *vdev)
>>      if (vdev->msix) {
>>          msix_uninit(&vdev->pdev, &vdev->bars[vdev->msix->table_bar].mem,
>>                      &vdev->bars[vdev->msix->pba_bar].mem);
>> +        msix_free(&vdev->pdev);
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/hw/net/vmxnet3.c b/hw/net/vmxnet3.c
>> index 49c2466..2a79e52 100644
>> --- a/hw/net/vmxnet3.c
>> +++ b/hw/net/vmxnet3.c
>> @@ -1979,6 +1979,7 @@ vmxnet3_init_msix(VMXNET3State *s)
>>          if (!vmxnet3_use_msix_vectors(s, VMXNET3_MAX_INTRS)) {
>>              VMW_WRPRN("Failed to use MSI-X vectors, error %d", res);
>>              msix_uninit(d, &s->msix_bar, &s->msix_bar);
>> +            msix_free(d);
>>              s->msix_used = false;
>>          } else {
>>              s->msix_used = true;
>> @@ -1996,6 +1997,8 @@ vmxnet3_cleanup_msix(VMXNET3State *s)
>>          msix_vector_unuse(d, VMXNET3_MAX_INTRS);
>>          msix_uninit(d, &s->msix_bar, &s->msix_bar);
>>      }
>> +
>> +    msix_free(d);
>>  }
>>  
>>  #define VMXNET3_MSI_NUM_VECTORS   (1)
>> diff --git a/hw/pci/msix.c b/hw/pci/msix.c
>> index 3430770..0618e3b 100644
>> --- a/hw/pci/msix.c
>> +++ b/hw/pci/msix.c
>> @@ -359,16 +359,26 @@ void msix_uninit(PCIDevice *dev, MemoryRegion 
>> *table_bar, MemoryRegion *pba_bar)
>>      msix_free_irq_entries(dev);
>>      dev->msix_entries_nr = 0;
>>      memory_region_del_subregion(pba_bar, &dev->msix_pba_mmio);
>> -    memory_region_destroy(&dev->msix_pba_mmio);
>> -    g_free(dev->msix_pba);
>> -    dev->msix_pba = NULL;
>>      memory_region_del_subregion(table_bar, &dev->msix_table_mmio);
>> -    memory_region_destroy(&dev->msix_table_mmio);
>> -    g_free(dev->msix_table);
>> +    dev->cap_present &= ~QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void msix_free(PCIDevice *dev)
>> +{
>> +    if (dev->msix_pba) {
>> +        memory_region_destroy(&dev->msix_pba_mmio);
>> +        g_free(dev->msix_pba);
>> +    }
>> +    dev->msix_pba = NULL;
>> +
>> +    if (dev->msix_table) {
>> +        memory_region_destroy(&dev->msix_table_mmio);
>> +        g_free(dev->msix_table);
>> +    }
>>      dev->msix_table = NULL;
>> +
>>      g_free(dev->msix_entry_used);
>>      dev->msix_entry_used = NULL;
>> -    dev->cap_present &= ~QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX;
>>  }
>>  
> 
> I dislike the if (...) here. This only works as long
> as all data is pointers.
> So I'd prefer QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX to be cleared in msix_free.
> This way msix_free can just check QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX
> and return if not there.

Makes sense.

Paolo