qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: s390: add and extend interrupt info


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: s390: add and extend interrupt information data structs
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 01:38:52 +0200

On 06.09.2013, at 14:19, Jens Freimann wrote:

> With the currently available struct kvm_s390_interrupt it is not possible to
> inject every kind of interrupt as defined in the z/Architecture. Add
> additional interruption parameters to the structures and move it to kvm.h
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Freimann <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 34 +---------------------
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h         | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h 
> b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index e87ecaa..adb05c5 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
> #include <asm/debug.h>
> #include <asm/cpu.h>
> 
> @@ -162,18 +163,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_stat {
>       u32 diagnose_9c;
> };
> 
> -struct kvm_s390_io_info {
> -     __u16        subchannel_id;            /* 0x0b8 */
> -     __u16        subchannel_nr;            /* 0x0ba */
> -     __u32        io_int_parm;              /* 0x0bc */
> -     __u32        io_int_word;              /* 0x0c0 */
> -};
> -
> -struct kvm_s390_ext_info {
> -     __u32 ext_params;
> -     __u64 ext_params2;
> -};
> -
> #define PGM_OPERATION            0x01
> #define PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP      0x02
> #define PGM_EXECUTE              0x03
> @@ -182,27 +171,6 @@ struct kvm_s390_ext_info {
> #define PGM_SPECIFICATION        0x06
> #define PGM_DATA                 0x07
> 
> -struct kvm_s390_pgm_info {
> -     __u16 code;
> -};
> -
> -struct kvm_s390_prefix_info {
> -     __u32 address;
> -};
> -
> -struct kvm_s390_extcall_info {
> -     __u16 code;
> -};
> -
> -struct kvm_s390_emerg_info {
> -     __u16 code;
> -};
> -
> -struct kvm_s390_mchk_info {
> -     __u64 cr14;
> -     __u64 mcic;
> -};
> -
> struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info {
>       struct list_head list;
>       u64     type;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 99c2533..eeb08a1 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -434,6 +434,69 @@ struct kvm_s390_interrupt {
>       __u64 parm64;
> };
> 
> +struct kvm_s390_io_info {
> +     __u16 subchannel_id;
> +     __u16 subchannel_nr;
> +     __u32 io_int_parm;
> +     __u32 io_int_word;
> +};
> +
> +struct kvm_s390_ext_info {
> +     __u32 ext_params;
> +     __u32 pad;
> +     __u64 ext_params2;
> +};
> +
> +struct kvm_s390_pgm_info {
> +     __u64 trans_exc_code;
> +     __u64 mon_code;
> +     __u64 per_address;
> +     __u32 data_exc_code;
> +     __u16 code;
> +     __u16 mon_class_nr;
> +     __u8 per_code;
> +     __u8 per_atmid;
> +     __u8 exc_access_id;
> +     __u8 per_access_id;
> +     __u8 op_access_id;
> +     __u8 pad[3];
> +};
> +
> +struct kvm_s390_prefix_info {
> +     __u32 address;
> +};
> +
> +struct kvm_s390_extcall_info {
> +     __u16 code;
> +};
> +
> +struct kvm_s390_emerg_info {
> +     __u16 code;
> +};
> +
> +struct kvm_s390_mchk_info {
> +     __u64 cr14;
> +     __u64 mcic;
> +     __u64 failing_storage_address;
> +     __u32 ext_damage_code;
> +     __u32 pad;
> +     __u8 fixed_logout[16];
> +};
> +
> +struct kvm_s390_irq {
> +     __u64 type;
> +     union {
> +             struct kvm_s390_io_info io;
> +             struct kvm_s390_ext_info ext;
> +             struct kvm_s390_pgm_info pgm;
> +             struct kvm_s390_emerg_info emerg;
> +             struct kvm_s390_extcall_info extcall;
> +             struct kvm_s390_prefix_info prefix;
> +             struct kvm_s390_mchk_info mchk;
> +             char reserved[64];
> +     };

Avi always complained about anonymous structs :). Apparently they're a gcc only 
extension.


Alex




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]