[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] import kvm-unittest in QEMU source tree
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] import kvm-unittest in QEMU source tree |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:26:09 +0200 |
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:17:57PM +0100, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Gleb Natapov <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:06:19PM -0700, Andrew Jones wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:03:37PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> > This simply imports kvm-unittest git into qemu source tree.
> >> >
> >> > We can next work on making make check run it
> >> > automatically.
> >> >
> >> > Squashed 'kvm-unittest/' content from commit 2bc0e29
> >> >
> >> > git-subtree-dir: kvm-unittest
> >> > git-subtree-split: 2bc0e29ee4447bebcd3b90053881f59265306adc
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> >
> >> > Gleb, Paolo, any objections to this? I really want a small guest for
> >> > running ACPI tests during make check, and kvm-unittest seems to fit the
> >> > bill.
> >> >
> >> > Ability to test e.g. PCI with this in-tree would be very benefitial.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Sorry for slow reply, I just noticed this mail now.
> >>
> >> So far qemu is a dependency for kvm-unit-tests (both x86 and arm use it),
> >> but at some point that could change (if another arch doesn't want to use
> >> qemu). So if that happens, then it won't make much sense for the tests to
> >> live in qemu. Thus I'm not 100% in favor of moving them. However, if the
> >> consensus is to move them, then I have two comments on this patch.
> >>
> > Do not worry, we are far from such consensus :)
>
> I don't think kvm-unit-tests belong in QEMU either. They are tied to
> the kernel side of things, not QEMU and many of the tests don't make
> sense for TCG.
>
> If you want to execute guest code within QEMU's make check, we can
> copy the basic infrastructure in kvm-unit-tests. It's so simple that
> a "fork" isn't really much of a concern to me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
For now I'm only testing the bios so it's even simpler,
I just put 16 bit code in the boot sector.
> >> 1) There are a couple pendings patches on the kvm list that tidy up the
> >> kvm-unit-tests repo - removing lots of the files. That should be
> >> committed first to avoid importing a bunch of files right before deleting
> >> them.
> >>
> >> 2) The name shouldn't change from kvm-unit-tests to kvm-unittest.
> >>
> >> drew
> >
> > --
> > Gleb.