qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] i386: pc: align gpa<->hpa on 1GB boundary (v6)


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] i386: pc: align gpa<->hpa on 1GB boundary (v6)
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:13:15 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130923 Thunderbird/17.0.9

>             assert(piecetwosize <= holesize);
> 
>             piecetwosize = MIN(above_4g_mem_size, piecetwosize);
>             if ((above_4g_mem_size - piecetwosize) > 0) {
>                 memory_region_init_alias(ram_above_4g, NULL, "ram-above-4g",
>                                          ram, 0x100000000ULL,
>                                          above_4g_mem_size - piecetwosize);
>                 memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, 0x100000000ULL,
>                                          ram_above_4g);
>             } else {
>                 g_free(ram_above_4g);
>             }
>             memory_region_init_alias(ram_above_4g_piecetwo, NULL,
>                                      "ram-above-4g-piecetwo", ram,
>                                      0x100000000ULL - holesize, piecetwosize);
>             memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory,
>                                         0x100000000ULL +
>                                         above_4g_mem_size - piecetwosize,
>                                         ram_above_4g_piecetwo);

There is still a small problem in that the 2MB rounding must not be
done for old machine types.

I did a really careful review of the code and everything else looks okay
to me.  However, it grew by accretion from v1 and now it took me really a
long time to figure it out...  I adjusted it a bit and the result seems
easier to understand to me.

Here's the hw/i386/pc.c part of the patch (the patch from v6 is unreadable):

diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
index 12c436e..f2fd138 100644
--- a/hw/i386/pc.c
+++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
@@ -1156,8 +1156,10 @@ FWCfgState *pc_memory_init(MemoryRegion *system_memory,
 {
     int linux_boot, i;
     MemoryRegion *ram, *option_rom_mr;
-    MemoryRegion *ram_below_4g, *ram_above_4g;
+    MemoryRegion *ram_below_4g, *ram_above_4g_pieceone, *ram_above_4g_piecetwo;
     FWCfgState *fw_cfg;
+    uint64_t holesize, pieceonesize, piecetwosize;
+    uint64_t memsize, align_offset;
 
     linux_boot = (kernel_filename != NULL);
 
@@ -1165,26 +1167,74 @@ FWCfgState *pc_memory_init(MemoryRegion *system_memory,
      * aliases to address portions of it, mostly for backwards compatibility
      * with older qemus that used qemu_ram_alloc().
      */
+    memsize = below_4g_mem_size + above_4g_mem_size;
+    holesize = 0x100000000ULL - below_4g_mem_size;
+
+    /* If 1GB hugepages are used to back guest RAM, we want the
+     * physical address 4GB to map to 4GB in the RAM, so that
+     * memory beyond 4GB is aligned on a 1GB boundary, at the
+     * host physical address space.  Thus, the ram block range
+     * [holestart, 4GB] is mapped to the last holesize bytes of RAM:
+     *
+     *                      0      h     4G     memsize-holesize
+     *
+     * contiguous-ram-block [xxxxxx][yyy][zzzzz]
+     *                                '-----------.
+     * guest-addr-space     [xxxxxx]     [zzzzz][yyy]
+     *
+     * This is only done in new-enough machine types, and of course
+     * it is only necessary if the [zzzzz] block exists at all.
+     */
+    if (guest_info->gb_align && above_4g_mem_size > holesize) {
+        /* Round the allocation up to 2 MB to use more hugepages.
+         * Remove the slack from the [yyy] piece so that pieceonesize
+         * (and thus the start of piecetwo) remains aligned.
+         */
+        align_offset = ROUND_UP(memsize, 1UL << 21) - memsize;
+        piecetwosize = holesize - align_offset;
+    } else {
+        /* There's no "piece one", all memory above 4G starts
+         * at below_4g_mem_size in the RAM block.  Also no need
+         * to align anything.
+         */
+        align_offset = 0;
+        piecetwosize = above_4g_mem_size;
+    }
+
     ram = g_malloc(sizeof(*ram));
-    memory_region_init_ram(ram, NULL, "pc.ram",
-                           below_4g_mem_size + above_4g_mem_size);
+    memory_region_init_ram(ram, NULL, "pc.ram", memsize + align_offset);
     vmstate_register_ram_global(ram);
     *ram_memory = ram;
+
     ram_below_4g = g_malloc(sizeof(*ram_below_4g));
     memory_region_init_alias(ram_below_4g, NULL, "ram-below-4g", ram,
                              0, below_4g_mem_size);
     memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, 0, ram_below_4g);
+
+    pieceonesize = above_4g_mem_size - piecetwosize;
+    if (pieceonesize) {
+        ram_above_4g_pieceone = g_malloc(sizeof(*ram_above_4g_pieceone));
+        memory_region_init_alias(ram_above_4g_pieceone, NULL,
+                                 "ram-above-4g-pieceone", ram,
+                                 0x100000000ULL, pieceonesize);
+        memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, 0x100000000ULL,
+                                    ram_above_4g_pieceone);
+    }
+    if (piecetwosize) {
+        ram_above_4g_piecetwo = g_malloc(sizeof(*ram_above_4g_piecetwo));
+        memory_region_init_alias(ram_above_4g_piecetwo, NULL,
+                                 "ram-above-4g-piecetwo", ram,
+                                 below_4g_mem_size, piecetwosize);
+        memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory,
+                                    0x100000000ULL + pieceonesize,
+                                    ram_above_4g_piecetwo);
+    }
+
     e820_add_entry(0, below_4g_mem_size, E820_RAM);
     if (above_4g_mem_size > 0) {
-        ram_above_4g = g_malloc(sizeof(*ram_above_4g));
-        memory_region_init_alias(ram_above_4g, NULL, "ram-above-4g", ram,
-                                 below_4g_mem_size, above_4g_mem_size);
-        memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, 0x100000000ULL,
-                                    ram_above_4g);
         e820_add_entry(0x100000000ULL, above_4g_mem_size, E820_RAM);
     }
 
-
     /* Initialize PC system firmware */
     pc_system_firmware_init(rom_memory, guest_info->isapc_ram_fw);
 

Tests:

-m 3585 (without gb_align)
  0000000100000000-00000001000fffff (prio 0, RW): alias ram-above-4g-piecetwo 
@pc.ram 00000000e0000000-00000000e00fffff

-m 4096 (without gb_align)
  0000000100000000-000000011fffffff (prio 0, RW): alias ram-above-4g-piecetwo 
@pc.ram 00000000e0000000-00000000ffffffff

-m 4097 (without gb_align)
  0000000100000000-00000001200fffff (prio 0, RW): alias ram-above-4g @pc.ram 
00000000e0000000-00000001000fffff

-m 4097 (with gb_align, both high regions 2MB aligned, unused MB of RAM at 
0xfff00000)
  0000000100000000-00000001001fffff (prio 0, RW): alias ram-above-4g @pc.ram 
0000000100000000-00000001001fffff
  0000000100200000-00000001200fffff (prio 0, RW): alias ram-above-4g-piecetwo 
@pc.ram 00000000e0000000-00000000ffefffff

-m 8192 (without gb_align)
  0000000100000000-000000021fffffff (prio 0, RW): alias ram-above-4g-piecetwo 
@pc.ram 00000000e0000000-00000001ffffffff

-m 8192 (with gb_align)
  0000000100000000-00000001ffffffff (prio 0, RW): alias ram-above-4g @pc.ram 
0000000100000000-00000001ffffffff
  0000000200000000-000000021fffffff (prio 0, RW): alias ram-above-4g-piecetwo 
@pc.ram 00000000e0000000-00000000ffffffff

-m 8193 (without gb_align)
  0000000100000000-00000002200fffff (prio 0, RW): alias ram-above-4g-piecetwo 
@pc.ram 00000000e0000000-00000002000fffff

-m 8193 (with gb_align)
  0000000100000000-00000002001fffff (prio 0, RW): alias ram-above-4g @pc.ram 
0000000100000000-00000002001fffff
  0000000200200000-00000002200fffff (prio 0, RW): alias ram-above-4g-piecetwo 
@pc.ram 00000000e0000000-00000000ffefffff

Ok to apply this version?

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]