qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qom: detect bad reentrance during object_cl


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qom: detect bad reentrance during object_class_foreach
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 12:20:21 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0

Am 24.12.2013 07:49, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
> On 12/20/2013 10:43 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 12/20/2013 10:29 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 19.12.2013 12:38, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
>>>> What I wonder about is what is going to happen to the rest of what I
>>>> posted? Should I wait till this qom-next gets merged to upstream and repost
>>>> my patches for Alex Graf again? Thanks.
>>>
>>> I do intend to post a pull before Chistmas, reviewing+applying the last
>>> no_user patch from Markus was one key ingredient for that.
>>>
>>> Not sure which rest exactly you're referring to? I need to review your
>>> latest QemuOpts proposal among others. Actually I have a whole A4 page
>>> written down with series I'm wading through. ;)
>>
>>
>> I posted the "[PATCH v4 0/8] spapr: bootindex support" series which
>> included the 2 patches you mentioned in this series, from the rest - 3 are
>> for spapr and 3 are platform independent.
> 
> 
> 
> So? What do I do with my 6 patches from the "[PATCH v4 0/8] spapr:
> bootindex support" series? Thanks!

Be patient. ;)

1) I am on holidays and thus not available full-time.
2) Alex has already sent out his ppc PULL, so no urgency.
3) As mentioned, I plan to post QOM and CPU PULLs later today.

And no, you don't need to repost after parts of your series get applied
pretty much unmodified.

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]