qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/4] qcow2: fix offset overflow in qcow2_allo


From: Hu Tao
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/4] qcow2: fix offset overflow in qcow2_alloc_clusters_at()
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 18:01:20 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 06:13:48PM +0100, Benoît Canet wrote:
> Le Thursday 23 Jan 2014 à 11:04:06 (+0800), Hu Tao a écrit :
> > When cluster size is big enough it can lead offset overflow
> 
> Maybe "it can lead to an offset overflow in"
> > in qcow2_alloc_clusters_at(). This patch fixes it.

Sure.

> > 
> > The allocation each time is stopped at L2 table boundary
> "The allocation is stopped each time at"

Sure.

> 
> > (see handle_alloc()), so the possible maximum bytes could be
> > 
> >   2^(cluster_bits - 3 + cluster_bits)
> 
> So if understand cluster_bits - 3 is used to compute the number of entry by L2
> and the additional cluster_bits is to take into account each clusters 
> referenced
> by the L2 entries.

Exactly. This is clearer than just one calculation. Do you mind I
put the sentence in commit message?

> It makes sense.
> 
> > 
> > so int is safe for cluster_bits<=17, unsafe otherwise.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  block/qcow2-refcount.c | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/qcow2-refcount.c b/block/qcow2-refcount.c
> > index c974abe..8712d8b 100644
> > --- a/block/qcow2-refcount.c
> > +++ b/block/qcow2-refcount.c
> > @@ -676,7 +676,13 @@ int qcow2_alloc_clusters_at(BlockDriverState *bs, 
> > uint64_t offset,
> >      BDRVQcowState *s = bs->opaque;
> >      uint64_t cluster_index;
> >      uint64_t old_free_cluster_index;
> > -    int i, refcount, ret;
> > +    uint64_t i;
> > +    int refcount, ret;
> > +
> 
> 
> > +    assert(nb_clusters >= 0);
> > +    if (nb_clusters == 0) {
> > +        return 0;
> > +    }
> ^
> Adding a a line on the commit message about this assertion and chunk of code
> would be helpful.

How about

  Add an assert to guard the comparation between signed and unsigned

?

> 
> Best regards
> 
> Benoît
> 
> >  
> >      /* Check how many clusters there are free */
> >      cluster_index = offset >> s->cluster_bits;
> > -- 
> > 1.8.5.2.229.g4448466
> > 
> > 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]