[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM vs QAPI for QMP APIs
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM vs QAPI for QMP APIs |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:39:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Am 25.02.2014 um 11:47 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> Il 25/02/2014 11:15, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> >On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Kevin Wolf <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>> External QOM interfaces have their place, especially for debugging or
> >>> trying out things before there is a proper API, but it's not as the
> >>> primary external interface.
> >Yes, I agree.
>
> -object is an exception to this though, isn't it?
I'd prefer if -object weren't the primary interface for anything.
We could define a few stable types that are meant to be created,
queried and manipulated using QOM, but it would blur the line.
Kevin
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM vs QAPI for QMP APIs, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM vs QAPI for QMP APIs, Markus Armbruster, 2014/02/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM vs QAPI for QMP APIs, Eric Blake, 2014/02/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM vs QAPI for QMP APIs, Markus Armbruster, 2014/02/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM vs QAPI for QMP APIs, Andreas Färber, 2014/02/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM vs QAPI for QMP APIs, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/02/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM vs QAPI for QMP APIs, Andreas Färber, 2014/02/25
Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM vs QAPI for QMP APIs, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2014/02/21