Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 2/9] vl: use qemu machine QOM class instead of global machines list

[Marcel Apfelbaum]

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 15:52 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 03.03.2014 14:03, schrieb Marcel Apfelbaum:
> > On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 13:57 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 03/03/2014 13:58, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> >>> On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 03:07:05PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> >>>>> The machine registration flow is refactored to use the QOM 
> >>>>> functionality.
> >>>>> Instead of linking the machines into a list, each machine has a type
> >>>>> and the types can be traversed in the QOM way.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
> >>> Nice.
> > Thanks!
> > 
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> >>>
> >>> This patch already looks like a nice cleanup. How about queueing
> >>> this and the preceding patch straight away?
> >>> Which tree is appropriate? I'm guessing QOM?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Fine by me.
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Where can I find the QOM tree? I ask because I will rebase the series on 
> > this tree...
> 
> github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu qom-next
> 
> but I hope rebasing won't be necessary, just give me some more time to
> look at the series.
Sure, I appreciate you are going over it.

> 
> Thanks a lot for your efforts already, it sounds very promising!
Thanks! 
Marcel

> 
> Cheers,
> Andreas
>