[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] seccomp: add shmctl(), mlock(), and munlock() t
From: |
Paul Moore |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] seccomp: add shmctl(), mlock(), and munlock() to the syscall whitelist |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:41:54 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.12.2 (Linux/3.12.9-gentoo; KDE/4.12.2; x86_64; ; ) |
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:25:01 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> Additional testing reveals that PulseAudio requires shmctl() and the
> mlock()/munlock() syscalls on some systems/configurations. As before,
> on systems that do require these syscalls, the problem can be seen with
> the following command line:
>
> # qemu -monitor stdio -sandbox on \
> -device intel-hda -device hda-duplex
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <address@hidden>
> ---
> qemu-seccomp.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c
> index caa926e..3db1e9b 100644
> --- a/qemu-seccomp.c
> +++ b/qemu-seccomp.c
> @@ -225,7 +225,10 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall
> seccomp_whitelist[] = { { SCMP_SYS(fchmod), 240 },
> { SCMP_SYS(shmget), 240 },
> { SCMP_SYS(shmat), 240 },
> - { SCMP_SYS(shmdt), 240 }
> + { SCMP_SYS(shmdt), 240 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(shmctl), 240 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(mlock), 240 },
> + { SCMP_SYS(munlock), 240 }
> };
>
> int seccomp_start(void)
Bump to bring this back the forefront of everyone's minds. Can we get this
merged?
--
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] seccomp: add shmctl(), mlock(), and munlock() to the syscall whitelist,
Paul Moore <=