qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.0?] target-i386: fix gdb debugging with la


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.0?] target-i386: fix gdb debugging with large memory guests
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:36:17 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

Il 18/03/2014 08:19, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 2014-03-18 02:54, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
If you start a Linux guest with more than 4GB of memory and try to look at a
memory address, you will get an error from gdb:

(gdb) p node_data[0]->node_id
Cannot access memory at address 0xffff88013fffd3a0
(gdb)

I suppose this is x86-64, not 32-bit with PTE, right?


I debugged this down to x86_cpu_get_phys_page_debug(), it doesn't handle the
case where the PDPTE has the PS bit set (although I didn't check where Linux
sets that bit). This commit adds the PS bit handling, which fixes the problem
for me.

Signed-off-by: Luiz capitulino <address@hidden>
---

Two observations:

 1. This bug has always existed, so it's not a regression, so I'm not sure
    it's worth it to fix for 2.0

Sure, why not?

 2. I'm not familiar with every detail of x86_cpu_get_phys_page_debug(),
    so I'm not completely sure this is the right thing to do

 target-i386/helper.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target-i386/helper.c b/target-i386/helper.c
index 4f447b8..9b7803f 100644
--- a/target-i386/helper.c
+++ b/target-i386/helper.c
@@ -951,6 +951,13 @@ hwaddr x86_cpu_get_phys_page_debug(CPUState *cs, vaddr 
addr)
                 return -1;
         }

+        if (pdpe & PG_PSE_MASK) {
+            page_size = 1024 * 1024 * 1024;
+            pte = pdpe & ~( (page_size - 1) & ~0xfff);
+            pte &= ~(PG_NX_MASK | PG_HI_USER_MASK);
+            goto out;
+        }

Does this also apply if we are not in long mode?

No, it doesn't. The only valid bits in a PAE PDPTE are P, PWT and PCD. Bit 7 (PS) is reserved.

Paolo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]