qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Makefile: Fix per-object variables for Makefile


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Makefile: Fix per-object variables for Makefile.target
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:28:12 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Tue, 04/29 08:29, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/04/2014 05:29, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
> > The compiling is done in a subdir, so the extraction of per-object libs
> > and cflags are referencing objects with ../ prefixed. So prefix the
> > per-object variables "foo.o-cflags" and "foo.o-libs" to
> > "../foo.o-cflags" and "../foo.o-libs".
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  Makefile.target | 11 ++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Makefile.target b/Makefile.target
> > index ba12340..3a30aad 100644
> > --- a/Makefile.target
> > +++ b/Makefile.target
> > @@ -146,11 +146,12 @@ obj-y-save := $(obj-y)
> >  block-obj-y :=
> >  common-obj-y :=
> >  include $(SRC_PATH)/Makefile.objs
> > -dummy := $(call unnest-vars,.., \
> > -               block-obj-y \
> > -               block-obj-m \
> > -               common-obj-y \
> > -               common-obj-m)
> > +vars := block-obj-y \
> > +        block-obj-m \
> > +        common-obj-y \
> > +        common-obj-m
> > +dummy := $(foreach v,$(vars),$(call fix-obj-vars,$v,../))
> > +dummy := $(call unnest-vars,.., $(vars))
> >  
> >  # Now restore obj-y
> >  obj-y := $(obj-y-save)
> > 
> 
> What about this instead, does it do the same?

Yes, it's better!

Fam

> 
> diff --git a/rules.mak b/rules.mak
> index 5c454d8..7038576 100644
> --- a/rules.mak
> +++ b/rules.mak
> @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ endef
>  define unnest-vars
>  $(eval obj := $1)
>  $(eval nested-vars := $2)
> +$(foreach v,$(nested-vars),$(call fix-obj-vars,$v,$(if $(obj),$(obj)/)))
>  $(eval old-nested-dirs := )
>  $(call unnest-vars-1)
>  $(if $1,$(foreach v,$(nested-vars),$(eval \
> 
> Regarding Michael's objection, I do have a simplification patch
> pending to use subdir-y instead of embedding directories in the
> object variables.  That does make things a bit simpler.
> 
> Paolo
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]