[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU build broken

From: Brad Smith
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU build broken
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 20:22:03 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 TenFourFox/G5 Tenfourbird

On 10/05/14 3:07 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 10/05/2014 08:45, Brad Smith ha scritto:

Having your feature in-tree is a privilege, not a right.  You earn it by
helping to maintain it.  "it's not really maintained right now" means it
has not been earning its keep.  You're encouraged to remedy that.

Huh? "my feature"? I have nothing to do with this. What kind of crazy
is this? How to misdirect and not take responsibility for breaking
something. If there wasn't sloppy irresponsible development in the
first place it wouldn't be an issue.


all this is doing, is convincing people that bsd-user is not worth
keeping in the tree.  It's a fact that in a million-line codebase not
all patches can be tested by all people.

My posts have nothing to do with bsd-user. I don't give a shit about it.
The real issue is the process and the fact that someone removed a constant from the configure script and didn't even grep the tree to see
if it existed anywhere else. That is very sloppy.

Why don't you send a patch instead of whining?

Constantly trying to deflect from the real issues.

This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]