[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] s390x: split flic into kvm and non-kvm p
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] s390x: split flic into kvm and non-kvm parts
Mon, 12 May 2014 10:09:28 +0200
On Mon, 12 May 2014 10:01:31 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 08/05/14 15:03, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > Introduce a common parent class for both cases, where kvm and non-kvm
> > can hook up callbacks. This will be used by follow-on patches for
> > adapter registration and mapping.
> > We now always have a flic, regardless of whether we use kvm; the
> > non-kvm implementation just doesn't do anything.
> > Reviewed-by: Jens Freimann <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > default-configs/s390x-softmmu.mak | 3 +-
> > hw/intc/Makefile.objs | 1 +
> > hw/intc/s390_flic.c | 318
> > ++++--------------------------------
> > hw/intc/s390_flic_kvm.c | 325
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/hw/s390x/s390_flic.h | 51 ++++--
> Shouldnt we move this to include/hw/intc/ ?
Current code is a bit undecided: Some interrupt controllers (like arm
gic) have their headers in include/hw/intc/, some (like openpic and
xics) in the architecture specific directories. Should we decide to
collect all of those headers in include/hw/intc/, I vote for doing that
in a general sweep.
> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden>
> > 5 files changed, 399 insertions(+), 299 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 hw/intc/s390_flic_kvm.c