qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH FOR 2.1 1/5] tests/test-qmp-event: fix for GLib


From: Luiz Capitulino
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH FOR 2.1 1/5] tests/test-qmp-event: fix for GLib < 2.31
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:28:07 -0400

On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:15:35 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:

> Il 25/06/2014 15:13, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:33:56 -0700
> > Wenchao Xia <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> On old GLib, the test needs a g_thread_init call.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Wenchao Xia <address@hidden>
> >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> >> Tested-by: Wenchao Xia <address@hidden>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >>  tests/test-qmp-event.c |    1 +
> >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tests/test-qmp-event.c b/tests/test-qmp-event.c
> >> index cb1e441..17c6444 100644
> >> --- a/tests/test-qmp-event.c
> >> +++ b/tests/test-qmp-event.c
> >> @@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ static void test_event_d(TestEventData *data,
> >>
> >>  int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >>  {
> >> +    g_thread_init(NULL);
> >>      qmp_event_set_func_emit(event_test_emit);
> >>
> >>      g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
> >
> > This breaks make check on F20:
> >
> > """
> > /home/lcapitulino/work/src/upstream/qmp-unstable/tests/test-qmp-event.c: In 
> > function ‘main’:
> > /home/lcapitulino/work/src/upstream/qmp-unstable/tests/test-qmp-event.c:254:5:
> >  error: ‘g_thread_init’ is deprecated (declared at 
> > /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gthread.h:260) 
> > [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
> >      g_thread_init(NULL);
> >      ^
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > make: *** [tests/test-qmp-event.o] Error 1
> > """
> >
> > I think the best way to fix this is to make util/osdep.c:thread_init()
> > public (maybe by moving it to include/glib-compat.h) and use that instead.
> > Also, note that thread_init()'s body is duplicated in a few other places,
> > so maybe those places should call it too.
> >
> > You may want to do this in a different series, then I can skip this patch
> > and apply the rest of the series.
> >
> 
> Thanks Luiz, it's a good suggestion.

Paolo, Wenchao, are one of one going to work on this?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]