qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] hw/vfio: create common module


From: Eric Auger
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] hw/vfio: create common module
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:09:16 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

On 08/11/2014 09:25 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 15:25 +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..4684ee5
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
>> +/*
>> + * common header for vfio based device assignment support
>> + *
>> + * Copyright Red Hat, Inc. 2012
>> + *
>> + * Authors:
>> + *  Alex Williamson <address@hidden>
>> + *
>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2.  See
>> + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
>> + *
>> + * Based on qemu-kvm device-assignment:
>> + *  Adapted for KVM by Qumranet.
>> + *  Copyright (c) 2007, Neocleus, Alex Novik (address@hidden)
>> + *  Copyright (c) 2007, Neocleus, Guy Zana (address@hidden)
>> + *  Copyright (C) 2008, Qumranet, Amit Shah (address@hidden)
>> + *  Copyright (C) 2008, Red Hat, Amit Shah (address@hidden)
>> + *  Copyright (C) 2008, IBM, Muli Ben-Yehuda (address@hidden)
>> + */
>> +#ifndef HW_VFIO_VFIO_COMMON_H
>> +#define HW_VFIO_VFIO_COMMON_H
>> +
>> +#include "qemu-common.h"
>> +#include "exec/address-spaces.h"
>> +#include "exec/memory.h"
>> +#include "qemu/queue.h"
>> +#include "qemu/notify.h"
>> +
>> +/*#define DEBUG_VFIO*/
>> +#ifdef DEBUG_VFIO
>> +#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) \
>> +    do { fprintf(stderr, "vfio: " fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
>> +#else
>> +#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) \
>> +    do { } while (0)
>> +#endif
> 
> 
> DPRINTF also need to be renamed to avoid conflicting namespace issues.
Ji Alex,

OK.

As I am going to touch at traces,
- are you OK if I use the new .name field to simply format strings?

    DPRINTF("%s(%04x:%02x:%02x.%x) Pin %c\n", __func__, vdev->host.domain,
            vdev->host.bus, vdev->host.slot, vdev->host.function,
            'A' + vdev->intx.pin);
- Also Alex was suggesting to use trace points. What is your position
about that? Also I am not 100% sure of what it consists in? is it trace
events as documented in docs/tracing.txt

Thanks

Eric



> Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]