qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 02/27] bootindex: add del_boot_device_path fu


From: Gonglei (Arei)
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 02/27] bootindex: add del_boot_device_path function
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 06:47:13 +0000

> From: Gerd Hoffmann [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 2:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/27] bootindex: add del_boot_device_path function
> Importance: High
> 
>   Hi,
> 
> > +static bool is_same_fw_dev_path(DeviceState *src, DeviceState *dst)
> > +{
> > +    bool ret = false;
> > +    char *devpath_src = qdev_get_fw_dev_path(src);
> > +    char *devpath_dst = qdev_get_fw_dev_path(dst);
> > +
> > +    if (!strcmp(devpath_src, devpath_dst)) {
> > +        ret = true;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    g_free(devpath_src);
> > +    g_free(devpath_dst);
> > +    return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void del_boot_device_path(DeviceState *dev)
> > +{
> > +    FWBootEntry *i;
> > +
> > +    assert(dev != NULL);
> > +
> > +    /* remove all entries of the assigned device */
> > +    QTAILQ_FOREACH(i, &fw_boot_order, link) {
> > +        if (i->dev == NULL) {
> > +            continue;
> > +        }
> > +        if ((i->dev == dev || is_same_fw_dev_path(i->dev, dev))) {
> 
> Why this is needed?  Is there any case where i-->dev != dev but
> is_same_fw_dev_path() returns true?
> 
Yes, it is needed. At present, the virito-net-pci device 
compliance with this situation.

Please see the qom path about virtio-net-pci and virtio-net device:

id: null, /machine/peripheral/nic1/virtio-backend
id: nic1, /machine/peripheral/nic1

Best regards,
-Gonglei

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]