[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?
From: |
Liviu Ionescu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:52:59 +0200 |
On 28 Oct 2014, at 14:45, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>> qemu: Unsupported SemiHosting SWI 0x00
>> R00=00000000 R01=00000000 R02=00000000 R03=00000000
>> R04=00000000 R05=00000000 R06=00000000 R07=200ffed8
>> R08=00000000 R09=00000000 R10=00000000 R11=00000000
>> R12=00000000 R13=200ffed8 R14=000022c5 R15=0000157c
>> PSR=60000173 -ZC- T svc32
>> Abort trap: 6
>
> What code sequence and which semihosting function are
> you trying to use here?
I guess it is:
call_host (SEMIHOSTING_SYS_WRITE0, (void*) buf);
where SEMIHOSTING_SYS_WRITE0 = 0x04.
I calibrated my code with J-Link semihosting support, which is quite complete.
regards,
Liviu
- [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Liviu Ionescu, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Peter Maydell, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Liviu Ionescu, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Peter Maydell, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?,
Liviu Ionescu <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Peter Maydell, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Liviu Ionescu, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Peter Maydell, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Liviu Ionescu, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Peter Maydell, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Liviu Ionescu, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Peter Maydell, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Liviu Ionescu, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Peter Maydell, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Peter Maydell, 2014/10/28