qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/16] block/parallels: support padded Parallels


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/16] block/parallels: support padded Parallels images
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:05:48 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Am 15.12.2014 um 09:27 hat Denis V. Lunev geschrieben:
> Unfortunately, old guest OSes do not align partitions to page size by
> default. This is true for Windows 2003 and Windows XP.
> 
> For the time being Parallels was created an optimization for such OSes
> in its desktop product. Desktop users are not qualified enough to create
> properly aligned installations. Thus Parallels makes a blind guess
> on a customer behalf and creates so-called "padded" images if guest
> OS type is specified as WinXP, Win2k and Win2k3.
> 
> "Padding" is a value which should be added to guest LBA to obtain
> sector number inside the image. This results in a shifted images.
>    0123        offset inside image (in 512 byte sectors)
>   +-------
>   +.012        guest data (512 byte sectors)
>   +-------
> The information about this is available in DiskDescriptor.xml ONLY. There
> is no such data in the image header.
> 
> There share of such images could be evaluated as 6-8% according to the
> statistics in my hands.
> 
> This patch obtains proper value from XML and applies it on reading.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <address@hidden>
> Acked-by: Roman Kagan <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <address@hidden>
> CC: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
> CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
> ---
>  block/parallels.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/parallels.c b/block/parallels.c
> index c22b91b..fedb009 100644
> --- a/block/parallels.c
> +++ b/block/parallels.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ typedef struct BDRVParallelsState {
>      unsigned int tracks;
>  
>      unsigned int off_multiplier;
> +    unsigned int padding;
>  } BDRVParallelsState;
>  
>  
> @@ -235,6 +236,7 @@ static int parallels_open_xml(BlockDriverState *bs, int 
> flags, Error **errp)
>      const char *data;
>      char image_path[PATH_MAX];
>      Error *local_err = NULL;
> +    BDRVParallelsState *s = bs->opaque;
>  
>      ret = size = bdrv_getlength(bs->file);
>      if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -264,6 +266,19 @@ static int parallels_open_xml(BlockDriverState *bs, int 
> flags, Error **errp)
>      if (root == NULL) {
>          goto fail;
>      }
> +
> +    data = xml_get_text(root, "Disk_Parameters", "Padding", NULL);
> +    if (data != NULL) {
> +        char *endptr;
> +        unsigned long pad;
> +
> +        pad = strtoul(data, &endptr, 0);
> +        if ((endptr != NULL && *endptr != '\0') || pad > UINT_MAX) {

Can endptr even be NULL? Also, shouldn't you set errno = 0 before and
check it here?

> +            goto fail;
> +        }
> +        s->padding = (uint32_t)pad;

s->padding is unsigned int, pad is unsigned long. Why the cast to
uint32_t here, which is different from both?

> +    }
> +
>      image = xml_seek(root, "StorageData", "Storage", "Image", NULL);
>      data = ""; /* make gcc happy */
>      for (size = 0; image != NULL; image = image->next) {
> @@ -365,6 +380,10 @@ static int64_t seek_to_sector(BlockDriverState *bs, 
> int64_t sector_num)
>  static int parallels_read(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
>                      uint8_t *buf, int nb_sectors)
>  {
> +    BDRVParallelsState *s = bs->opaque;
> +
> +    sector_num += s->padding;

No check needed here? bdrv_check_request() has checked sector_num and
nb_sectors against the image size, but now you can't rely on the result
any more.

>      while (nb_sectors > 0) {
>          int64_t position = seek_to_sector(bs, sector_num);
>          if (position >= 0) {

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]