[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-pci: make pci bar layout more flexible.
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-pci: make pci bar layout more flexible. |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:04:44 +0100 |
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:55:50AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > VirtIOPCIProxy subclasses which need additional pci bars, such as
> > > virtio-vga, just need to make sure they register the additinal bars
> > > before initializing virtio-pci, so the superclass can see the registered
> > > bars and shuffle around the virtio bars accordingly.
> >
> > I think I prefer we just DTRT and keep same layouts for everyone by
> > default: isn't there a layout that is good for everybody?
>
> I want bar #2 for the vga framebuffer for virtio-vga. Which conflicts
> with bar #2 being used for the modern bar in todays code.
OK, and IIUC you are saying that using bar #2 for that is a requirement for
vga to work?
> We can move the modern bar to #4 for everybody, then we'll have:
>
> #0 -- legacy i/o
> #1 -- msix
> #2 -- unused (by virtio)
> #3 -- unused (by virtio)
> #4 -- modern mem
> #5 -- modern mem too (because it's 64bit).
>
> That'll leave bars #2 + #3 free, for additional bars (1x 64bit or 2x
> 32bit) such as vga framebuffer if needed.
Yes, that's fine with me.
> > I know this means we'll leave BAR0 unused for modern devices but that
> > does not seem too bad.
>
> Yep, no technical reason against it, although it IMHO looks nicer.
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
If we run into a problem, we'll be able to reshuffle it all easily.
--
MST