qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] target-i386: Register QOM properties for fe


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] target-i386: Register QOM properties for feature flags
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:53:22 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0

Am 08.04.2015 um 13:06 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 10:30:52AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 07/04/2015 22:46, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> This uses the feature name arrays to register "feat-*" QOM properties
>>> for feature flags. This simply adds the properties so they can be
>>> configured using -global, but doesn't change x86_cpu_parse_featurestr()
>>> to use them yet.
>>
>> Out of curiosity, why the prefix?  (Also, perhaps a prefix such as
>> "cpuid-*" would be better since the property often only affects the
>> cpuid leaves, rather than the availability of the feature itself).
> 
> The prefix exists to allow those properties to be easily identified by
> software that doesn't know the full list of feature names (I even took
> advantage of that on the x86-cpu-model-dump script).
> 
> About the reason for using the "feat-" prefix, the short answer is "it's
> the prefix used in the last patch that implemented this (by Igor)". I
> think the first suggestion was to use "f-", then we changed to
> "feature-" or "feat-", and simply stayed using "feat-" in the last few
> versions.

Fair to mention that they did not all get equal review. ;)

> But I like the "cpuid-" suggestion and plan to use it on v2. Any
> objections?

Assuming it's technically correct, +1 for cpuid-.

Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]