Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 0/7] Update tests/qemu-iotests failing cases for the s390 platform

[tu bo]

Hi Thomas:

thanks a lot.  I'll remove 'RFC' from the subject line and drop the 
backslash according to Max's advice, and create v10.

On 05/28/2015 06:01 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>   Hi Tu Bo!
>
> On Thu, 28 May 2015 12:29:57 +0800
> tu bo <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Hi Kevin:
> >
> > On 05/26/2015 07:55 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> ...
> > > Is this still an RFC series, as the subject indicates, or is it meant
> > > for inclusion?
> > This is my first task for qemu which I took over from Xiao Guang Chen,
> > and I'm not sure if I understand it well.  Does 'RFC' mean 'Reference
> > for Candidate'?  please correct me if I'm wrong.  If other actions I
> > need to take, please let me know.
> RFC means "Request for comments". You put it into a patch title if you
> want to get some comments about your patches, but don't consider them
> good enough for inclusion yet. See also the patch submission guideline
> for details: http://qemu-project.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch
>
> > Anyway,  this patch series is final version.  thanks
> I that case the title should normally not include "RFC" anymore.
>
>   Regards,
>    Thomas