qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V6 02/18] replace spinlock by QemuMutex.


From: Frederic Konrad
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V6 02/18] replace spinlock by QemuMutex.
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 13:48:24 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0

On 07/07/2015 12:22, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

On 07/07/2015 12:15, Alex Bennée wrote:
Why are the locking rules different for CONFIG_USER versus system
emulation? Looking at the final tree:

                  tb = tb_find_fast(env);
this eventually ends up doing a tb_lock on the find_slow path which IIRC
is when might end up doing the actual code generation.

Up to this point, system emulation is using the BQL for everything.  I
guess things change later.

Paolo
Actually we use tb_lock to protect all the tb related structure such as TBContext
etc.. Is it better to use the global lock for this?

Fred



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]