[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: drop _ADR entry from SP

From: Leif Lindholm
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: drop _ADR entry from SPCR
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 11:18:21 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 01:24:39AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 August 2015 at 14:25, Andrew Jones <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:55:14PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 02:28:03PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> >> > In the least I wouldn't want to get burned twice, so I'd prefer to
> >> > see the SPCR code actually get into Linux first this time. That
> >> > would also allow us to point at something when we start breaking
> >> > guests.
> >>
> >> So, if that's the way it has to be, that's the way it has to be.
> >> I'd just prefer not having different pieces of firmware validating
> >> different software behaviours for the same thing.
> >
> > Yeah, now it's messy. I'm actually OK with this QEMU patch, with regard
> > to the downstream stuff that I'm involved with, but other downstreams
> > may not be so flexible... We need Peter to chime in with his opinion,
> > CCed.
> Could somebody who understands ACPI and the ramifications
> here let me know if I should apply this patch, please?
> (since we're now post-2.4)

I presume my opinion is clear, but I'm cc:ing some of the Linaro ACPI

Graeme, Al - the patch in question is:


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]