qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Fix wrong size of flash


From: Wei Huang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Fix wrong size of flash
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:31:11 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0

On 09/16/2015 08:57 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
> 
> While virt machine creates two flash devices with total size 0x08000000,
> it wrongly uses this total size for each one. So it will overlap other
> MMIO spaces.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> index 2073573..bc858c8 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_flash(Aml *scope, const 
> MemMapEntry *flash_memmap)
>  {
>      Aml *dev, *crs;
>      hwaddr base = flash_memmap->base;
> -    hwaddr size = flash_memmap->size;
> +    hwaddr size = flash_memmap->size / 2;
>  
>      dev = aml_device("FLS0");
>      aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("LNRO0015")));
> 

In current code, it looks like both FLS0 and FLS1 are using up the whole
space. That would invade into the VIRT_CPUPERIPHS address space, which
apparently is wrong.

Reviewed-by: Wei Huang <address@hidden>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]