Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: Use common CPU cycle infrastructure

[Peter Maydell]

On 2 October 2015 at 21:48, Christopher Covington <address@hidden> wrote:
> What I meant to ask was, do you see any reason for cpu_get_ticks() to exist?
> If no architecture besides i386 wants to use it, perhaps the code should be
> moved there.

OTOH various non-x86 things do use the closely related cpu_get_real_ticks(),
and the implementation of cpu_get_ticks() is very closely related to
the other clock code in cpus.c.

-- PMM