[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: Use common CPU cycle infrastructure
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: Use common CPU cycle infrastructure |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:53:22 +0100 |
On 24 September 2015 at 20:43, Christopher Covington <address@hidden> wrote:
> cpu_get_ticks() provides a common interface across targets for
> calculating CPU cycles. Using this fixes PMCCNTR reads when -icount
> is specified (previously a non-increasing value was returned).
>
> Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <address@hidden>
> ---
> target-arm/helper.c | 9 +++------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
So, I think the conclusion from this thread was that we should
(a) change the default cpu_get_host_ticks() implementation to
call get_clock()
(b) rebase this patch and apply it
Is anybody planning to do that?
In any case, I'm taking this thread off my "must-review" list :-)
thanks
-- PMM
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: Use common CPU cycle infrastructure,
Peter Maydell <=