Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] libseccomp: add cacheflush to whitelist

[Eduardo Otubo]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 03=25=00PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Andrew Jones <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:03:37AM +0200, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11=39=46AM +0200, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 03=50=04PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> >> > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:31:19AM +0200, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> >> > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09=12=33AM -0400, Andrew Jones wrote:
> [...]
> >> > > > > diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c
> >> > > > > index f9de0d3390feb..33644a4e3c3d3 100644
> >> > > > > --- a/qemu-seccomp.c
> >> > > > > +++ b/qemu-seccomp.c
> >> > > > > @@ -237,7 +237,8 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall 
> >> > > > > seccomp_whitelist[] = {
> >> > > > >      { SCMP_SYS(fadvise64), 240 },
> >> > > > >      { SCMP_SYS(inotify_init1), 240 },
> >> > > > >      { SCMP_SYS(inotify_add_watch), 240 },
> >> > > > > -    { SCMP_SYS(mbind), 240 }
> >> > > > > +    { SCMP_SYS(mbind), 240 },
> >> > > > > +    { SCMP_SYS(cacheflush), 240 },
> >> 
> >> FYI: I had to fixed this minor mistake (using comma at the end of the
> >> list) before applying your patch.
> >
> > Does that violate a QEMU coding style? Because I actually put it there
> > on purpose so the next addition wouldn't have to modify the line (by
> > adding a comma), making git-blame more difficult to use.
> 
> We have trailing commas all over the place, for precisely the reason you
> gave.  I recommend to put it right back.
> 

Well, that makes a lot of sense. I'll just put it back again and send
the pull request once more.

ps.: I just thought the guideline said to make sure every commit should
be "compilable" with no errors, perhaps I saw it somewhere else. Sorry
for the trouble.

-- 
Eduardo Otubo
ProfitBricks GmbH

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature