qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] e1000: Fixing the received/transmitted octets'


From: Leonid Bloch
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] e1000: Fixing the received/transmitted octets' counters
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:53:17 +0300

Previously, the lower parts of these counters (TORL, TOTL) were
resetting after reaching their maximal values, and since the continuation
of counting in the higher parts (TORH, TOTH) was triggered by an
overflow event of the lower parts, the count was not correct.

Additionally, TORH and TOTH were counting the corresponding frames, and
not the octets, as they supposed to do.

Additionally, these 64-bit registers did not stick at their maximal
values when (and if) they reached them.

This fix resolves all the issues mentioned above, and makes the octet
counters behave according to Intel's specs.

Signed-off-by: Leonid Bloch <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Fleytman <address@hidden>
---
 hw/net/e1000.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/net/e1000.c b/hw/net/e1000.c
index 5530285..7f977b6 100644
--- a/hw/net/e1000.c
+++ b/hw/net/e1000.c
@@ -583,6 +583,28 @@ inc_reg_if_not_full(E1000State *s, int index)
     }
 }
 
+static void
+grow_8reg_if_not_full(E1000State *s, int index, int size)
+{
+    uint32_t lo = s->mac_reg[index];
+    uint32_t hi = s->mac_reg[index+1];
+
+    if (lo == 0xffffffff) {
+        if ((hi += size) > s->mac_reg[index+1]) {
+            s->mac_reg[index+1] = hi;
+        } else if (s->mac_reg[index+1] != 0xffffffff) {
+            s->mac_reg[index+1] = 0xffffffff;
+        }
+    } else {
+        if (((lo += size) < s->mac_reg[index])
+            && (s->mac_reg[index] = 0xffffffff)) {  /* setting low to full */
+            s->mac_reg[index+1] += ++lo;
+        } else {
+            s->mac_reg[index] = lo;
+        }
+    }
+}
+
 static inline int
 vlan_enabled(E1000State *s)
 {
@@ -632,7 +654,7 @@ static void
 xmit_seg(E1000State *s)
 {
     uint16_t len, *sp;
-    unsigned int frames = s->tx.tso_frames, css, sofar, n;
+    unsigned int frames = s->tx.tso_frames, css, sofar;
     struct e1000_tx *tp = &s->tx;
 
     if (tp->tse && tp->cptse) {
@@ -678,10 +700,8 @@ xmit_seg(E1000State *s)
     } else
         e1000_send_packet(s, tp->data, tp->size);
     inc_reg_if_not_full(s, TPT);
+    grow_8reg_if_not_full(s, TOTL, s->tx.size);
     s->mac_reg[GPTC] = s->mac_reg[TPT];
-    n = s->mac_reg[TOTL];
-    if ((s->mac_reg[TOTL] += s->tx.size) < n)
-        s->mac_reg[TOTH]++;
 }
 
 static void
@@ -1096,11 +1116,9 @@ e1000_receive_iov(NetClientState *nc, const struct iovec 
*iov, int iovcnt)
     /* TOR - Total Octets Received:
      * This register includes bytes received in a packet from the <Destination
      * Address> field through the <CRC> field, inclusively.
+     * Always include FCS length (4) in size.
      */
-    n = s->mac_reg[TORL] + size + /* Always include FCS length. */ 4;
-    if (n < s->mac_reg[TORL])
-        s->mac_reg[TORH]++;
-    s->mac_reg[TORL] = n;
+    grow_8reg_if_not_full(s, TORL, size+4);
 
     n = E1000_ICS_RXT0;
     if ((rdt = s->mac_reg[RDT]) < s->mac_reg[RDH])
-- 
2.4.3




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]