[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation
From: |
Juan Quintela |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:02:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <address@hidden>
>
> This is the 9th cut of my version of postcopy.
>
> The userfaultfd linux kernel code is now in the upstream kernel
> tree, and so 4.3 can be used without modification.
>
> This qemu series can be found at:
> https://github.com/orbitfp7/qemu.git
> on the wp3-postcopy-v9 tag
>
> Testing status:
> * Tested heavily on x86
> * Smoke tested on aarch64 (so it does work on different page sizes)
>
> This work has been partially funded by the EU Orbit project:
> see http://www.orbitproject.eu/about/
>
> v9
> Almost all of the changes are changes from review comments, and most are
> minor.
>
> The following are new patches, mostly split out from earlier patches
> (The exception being adding userfaultfd.h header back in - which was in v5
> but we took out, but is needed again due to 1842bdfd)
>
> 04/56 Move page_size_init earlier
> 08/56 qemu_ram_block_by_name
> 12/56 Factor out host_from_stream_offset call and check
> 15/56 Add Linux userfaultfd.h header back
> 21/56 migration_is_setup_or_active
> 30/56 migration_completion: Take current state
> 34/56 Maintain unsentmap
>
> The previous patches 03,10,13,36/54 went in upstream already.
>
> Fix for assert using hotplug (Thanks Bharata for spotting that)
> Fix for migrate_cancel a second time
> Rework for migration_bitmap_rcu after Denis's deadlock fix
> Rework ram_load into a separate postcopy loop
> The 'sentmap' is now an 'unsentmap' - this saves a complement step at the
> end
> The unsentmap creation is now split into a separate patch
> The unsentmap is now stored in the RCU structure (although it can't
> really resize during the migrate)
> Fix for block migration
> still not a suggested combination.
> Minor:
> trace_savevm_send_open_return_path added
> split migration_is_active function into separate patch and made
> migration_is_setup_or_active
> move file reads into migrate_handle_advise and migrate_handle_packaged
> use of MIN in send-packaged-chunk
> migration_thread_started -> migration_thread_running
> updated qemu_get_buffer_in_place with Juan's version (and size_t'ified
> it)
> split the host_from_stream_offset change into a separate patch
> 'ram_load: Factor out host_from_stream_offset call and check'
> split out ram_find_block_by_id into a separate patch and now
> called qemu_ram_block_by_name
> postcopy_discard_send_range etc now take start/length rather than
> start/end
> (also added another trace)
> split ram_save_host_page into ram_save_host_page/ram_save_target_page
> split host page cleanup function into a core that handles both passes
>
> Dave
I need the following patch to make things compile on 32bits, windows,
etc.
I guess you are ok with that (I have integrated it in the appropiate places)
Later, Juan.
diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
index fd51d79..58eb099 100644
--- a/migration/migration.c
+++ b/migration/migration.c
@@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ static void migrate_handle_rp_req_pages(MigrationState
*ms, const char* rbname,
if (start & (our_host_ps-1) ||
(len & (our_host_ps-1))) {
error_report("%s: Misaligned page request, start: " RAM_ADDR_FMT
- " len: " RAM_ADDR_FMT, __func__, start, len);
+ " len: %zd", __func__, start, len);
mark_source_rp_bad(ms);
return;
}
diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.c b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
index 23ceb75..22d6b18 100644
--- a/migration/postcopy-ram.c
+++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
@@ -641,37 +641,44 @@ int postcopy_ram_incoming_init(MigrationIncomingState
*mis, size_t ram_pages)
int postcopy_ram_incoming_cleanup(MigrationIncomingState *mis)
{
assert(0);
+ return -1;
}
int postcopy_ram_discard_range(MigrationIncomingState *mis, uint8_t *start,
size_t length)
{
assert(0);
+ return -1;
}
int postcopy_ram_prepare_discard(MigrationIncomingState *mis)
{
assert(0);
+ return -1;
}
int postcopy_ram_enable_notify(MigrationIncomingState *mis)
{
assert(0);
+ return -1;
}
int postcopy_place_page(MigrationIncomingState *mis, void *host, void *from)
{
assert(0);
+ return -1;
}
int postcopy_place_page_zero(MigrationIncomingState *mis, void *host)
{
assert(0);
+ return -1;
}
void *postcopy_get_tmp_page(MigrationIncomingState *mis)
{
assert(0);
+ return NULL;
}
#endif
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation, Bharata B Rao, 2015/11/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2015/11/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation, Bharata B Rao, 2015/11/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2015/11/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation, Bharata B Rao, 2015/11/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2015/11/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation, Bharata B Rao, 2015/11/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2015/11/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation, David Gibson, 2015/11/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/11/09
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 00/56] Postcopy implementation,
Juan Quintela <=