qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 5/5] ehci: make idt processing more robust


From: Gerd Hoffmann
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 5/5] ehci: make idt processing more robust
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 11:02:33 +0100

Make ehci_process_itd return an error in case we didn't do any actual
iso transfer because we've found no active transaction.  That'll avoid
ehci happily run in circles forever if the guest builds a loop out of
idts.

This is CVE-2015-8558.

Cc: address@hidden
Reported-by: Qinghao Tang <address@hidden>
Tested-by: P J P <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <address@hidden>
---
 hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c b/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c
index 4e2161b..d07f228 100644
--- a/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c
+++ b/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c
@@ -1389,7 +1389,7 @@ static int ehci_process_itd(EHCIState *ehci,
 {
     USBDevice *dev;
     USBEndpoint *ep;
-    uint32_t i, len, pid, dir, devaddr, endp;
+    uint32_t i, len, pid, dir, devaddr, endp, xfers = 0;
     uint32_t pg, off, ptr1, ptr2, max, mult;
 
     ehci->periodic_sched_active = PERIODIC_ACTIVE;
@@ -1479,9 +1479,10 @@ static int ehci_process_itd(EHCIState *ehci,
                 ehci_raise_irq(ehci, USBSTS_INT);
             }
             itd->transact[i] &= ~ITD_XACT_ACTIVE;
+            xfers++;
         }
     }
-    return 0;
+    return xfers ? 0 : -1;
 }
 
 
-- 
1.8.3.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]