[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation)
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation) |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Dec 2015 13:51:08 +0200 |
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:52:43AM +0300, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > A dedicated IRQ per device for something that is a system wide event
> > sounds like a waste. I don't understand why a spec change is strictly
> > required, we only need to support this with the specific virtual bridge
> > used by QEMU, so I think that a vendor specific capability will do.
> > Once this works well in the field, a PCI spec ECN might make sense
> > to standardise the capability.
>
> Keeping track of your discussion for some time, decided to jump in...
> So far, we want to have some kind of mailbox to notify the quest about
> migration. So what about some dedicated "pci device" for
> this purpose? Some kind of "migration controller". This is:
> a) perhaps easier to implement than capability, we don't need to push
> anything to PCI spec.
> b) could easily make friendship with Windows, because this means that no bus
> code has to be touched at all. It would rely only on
> drivers' ability to communicate with each other (i guess it should be
> possible in Windows, isn't it?)
> c) does not need to steal resources (BARs, IRQs, etc) from the actual devices.
>
> Kind regards,
> Pavel Fedin
> Expert Engineer
> Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
>
Sure, or we can use an ACPI device. It doesn't really matter what we do
for the mailbox. Whoever writes this first will get to select a
mechanism.
--
MST
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation), (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2015/12/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation), Alexander Duyck, 2015/12/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2015/12/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation), Alexander Duyck, 2015/12/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2015/12/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation), Dong, Eddie, 2015/12/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation), Alexander Duyck, 2015/12/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2015/12/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2015/12/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation), Pavel Fedin, 2015/12/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation),
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration vs device assignment (motivation), Yang Zhang, 2015/12/10