qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/3] Draft implementation of HPT resizing (qemu si


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/3] Draft implementation of HPT resizing (qemu side)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:02:33 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:18:17PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 04:44:38PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > Here is a draft qemu implementation of my proposed PAPR extension for
> > allowing runtime resizing of a KVM/ppc64 guest's hash page table.
> > That in turn will allow for more flexible memory hotplug.
> > 
> > This should work with the guest kernel side patches I also posted
> > recently [1].
> > 
> > Still required to make this into a full implementation:
> >   * Guest needs to auto-resize HPT on memory hotplug events
> > 
> >   * qemu needs to allocate HPT size based on current rather than
> >     maximum memory if the guest is HPT resize aware
> > 
> >   * KVM host side implementation
> > 
> >   * PAPR standardization
> 
> So with the current patchset (QEMU and guest kernel changes), I should
> be able to change the HTAB size of a PR guest right ? I see the below
> failure though:

Uh.. to be honest I haven't really considered the KVM case at all.
I'm kind of surprised it didn't just refuse to do anything.

> address@hidden ~]# cat /sys/kernel/debug/powerpc/pft-size 
> 24
> address@hidden ~]# echo 26 > /sys/kernel/debug/powerpc/pft-size
> [   65.996845] lpar: Attempting to resize HPT to shift 26
> [   65.996845] lpar: Attempting to resize HPT to shift 26
> [   66.113596] lpar: HPT resize to shift 26 complete (109 ms / 6 ms)
> [   66.113596] lpar: HPT resize to shift 26 complete (109 ms / 6 ms)
> 
> PR guest just hangs here while I see tons of below messages in
> the 1st level guest:
> 
> KVM can't copy data from 0x3fff99e91400!
> ...
> Couldn't emulate instruction 0x00000000 (op 0 xop 0)
> kvmppc_handle_exit_pr: emulation at 700 failed (00000000)

Hm, not sure why that's happening.  At first I thought it was because
we weren't updating SDR1 with the address of the new htab, but that's
actually in there.  Maybe the KVM PR code isn't rereading it after
initial VM startup.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]