qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 16/37] qapi: Swap 'name' in visit_* callbacks


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 16/37] qapi: Swap 'name' in visit_* callbacks to match public API
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:55:17 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:

> As explained in the previous patches, matching argument order of
> 'name, &value' to JSON's "name":value makes sense.  However,
> while the last two patches were easy with Coccinelle, I ended up
> doing this one all by hand.  Now all the visitor callbacks match
> the main interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
>
> ---
> v9: no change
> v8: new patch
> ---
>  include/qapi/visitor-impl.h  | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  qapi/opts-visitor.c          | 16 ++++++++--------
>  qapi/qapi-dealloc-visitor.c  | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
>  qapi/qapi-visit-core.c       | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  qapi/qmp-input-visitor.c     | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  qapi/qmp-output-visitor.c    | 16 ++++++++--------
>  qapi/string-input-visitor.c  | 16 ++++++++--------
>  qapi/string-output-visitor.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  8 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/qapi/visitor-impl.h b/include/qapi/visitor-impl.h
> index e6399d1..0257359 100644
> --- a/include/qapi/visitor-impl.h
> +++ b/include/qapi/visitor-impl.h
> @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
>  struct Visitor
>  {
>      /* Must be set */
> -    void (*start_struct)(Visitor *v, void **obj, const char *kind,
> -                         const char *name, size_t size, Error **errp);
> +    void (*start_struct)(Visitor *v, const char *name, void **obj,
> +                         const char *kind, size_t size, Error **errp);
>      void (*end_struct)(Visitor *v, Error **errp);
>
>      void (*start_implicit_struct)(Visitor *v, void **obj, size_t size,
> @@ -30,39 +30,42 @@ struct Visitor
>      GenericList *(*next_list)(Visitor *v, GenericList **list, Error **errp);
>      void (*end_list)(Visitor *v, Error **errp);
>
> -    void (*type_enum)(Visitor *v, int *obj, const char * const strings[],
> -                      const char *kind, const char *name, Error **errp);
> +    void (*type_enum)(Visitor *v, const char *name, int *obj,
> +                      const char * const strings[], const char *kind,

Opportunity to change to 'const char *const'.  I prefer that, because it
makes the fact that this is a pointer-* and not a binary operator-*
visually obvious.

Same elsewhere.

> +                      Error **errp);
>      /* May be NULL; only needed for input visitors. */
> -    void (*get_next_type)(Visitor *v, QType *type, bool promote_int,
> -                          const char *name, Error **errp);
> +    void (*get_next_type)(Visitor *v, const char *name, QType *type,
> +                          bool promote_int, Error **errp);
>
>      /* Must be set. */
> -    void (*type_int64)(Visitor *v, int64_t *obj, const char *name,
> +    void (*type_int64)(Visitor *v, const char *name, int64_t *obj,
>                         Error **errp);
>      /* Must be set. */
> -    void (*type_uint64)(Visitor *v, uint64_t *obj, const char *name,
> +    void (*type_uint64)(Visitor *v, const char *name, uint64_t *obj,
>                          Error **errp);
>      /* Optional; fallback is type_uint64().  */
> -    void (*type_size)(Visitor *v, uint64_t *obj, const char *name,
> +    void (*type_size)(Visitor *v, const char *name, uint64_t *obj,
>                        Error **errp);
>      /* Must be set. */
> -    void (*type_bool)(Visitor *v, bool *obj, const char *name, Error **errp);
> -    void (*type_str)(Visitor *v, char **obj, const char *name, Error **errp);
> -    void (*type_number)(Visitor *v, double *obj, const char *name,
> +    void (*type_bool)(Visitor *v, const char *name, bool *obj, Error **errp);
> +    void (*type_str)(Visitor *v, const char *name, char **obj, Error **errp);
> +    void (*type_number)(Visitor *v, const char *name, double *obj,
>                          Error **errp);
> -    void (*type_any)(Visitor *v, QObject **obj, const char *name,
> +    void (*type_any)(Visitor *v, const char *name, QObject **obj,
>                       Error **errp);
>
>      /* May be NULL; most useful for input visitors. */
> -    void (*optional)(Visitor *v, bool *present, const char *name);
> +    void (*optional)(Visitor *v, const char *name, bool *present);
>
>      bool (*start_union)(Visitor *v, bool data_present, Error **errp);
>      void (*end_union)(Visitor *v, bool data_present, Error **errp);
>  };
>
> -void input_type_enum(Visitor *v, int *obj, const char * const strings[],
> -                     const char *kind, const char *name, Error **errp);
> -void output_type_enum(Visitor *v, int *obj, const char * const strings[],
> -                      const char *kind, const char *name, Error **errp);
> +void input_type_enum(Visitor *v, const char *name, int *obj,
> +                     const char * const strings[], const char *kind,
> +                     Error **errp);
> +void output_type_enum(Visitor *v, const char *name, int *obj,
> +                      const char * const strings[], const char *kind,
> +                      Error **errp);
>
>  #endif

I checked the changes to this file carefully.  Can we rely on the
compiler to flag mistakes in the rest of the patch?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]