qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 08/16] softmmu: Honor the new exclusive bitmap


From: Alvise Rigo
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 08/16] softmmu: Honor the new exclusive bitmap
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:32:37 +0100

The pages set as exclusive (clean) in the DIRTY_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE bitmap
have to have their TLB entries flagged with TLB_EXCL. The accesses to
pages with TLB_EXCL flag set have to be properly handled in that they
can potentially invalidate an open LL/SC transaction.

Modify the TLB entries generation to honor the new bitmap and extend
the softmmu_template to handle the accesses made to guest pages marked
as exclusive.

In the case we remove a TLB entry marked as EXCL, we unset the
corresponding exclusive bit in the bitmap.

Suggested-by: Jani Kokkonen <address@hidden>
Suggested-by: Claudio Fontana <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo <address@hidden>
---
 cputlb.c           | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 softmmu_template.h | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cputlb.c b/cputlb.c
index ce6d720..aa9cc17 100644
--- a/cputlb.c
+++ b/cputlb.c
@@ -395,6 +395,16 @@ void tlb_set_page_with_attrs(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong 
vaddr,
     env->tlb_v_table[mmu_idx][vidx] = *te;
     env->iotlb_v[mmu_idx][vidx] = env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index];
 
+    if (unlikely(!(te->addr_write & TLB_MMIO) && (te->addr_write & TLB_EXCL))) 
{
+        /* We are removing an exclusive entry, set the page to dirty. This
+         * is not be necessary if the vCPU has performed both SC and LL. */
+        hwaddr hw_addr = (env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index].addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) +
+                                          (te->addr_write & TARGET_PAGE_MASK);
+        if (!cpu->ll_sc_context) {
+            cpu_physical_memory_unset_excl(hw_addr);
+        }
+    }
+
     /* refill the tlb */
     env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index].addr = iotlb - vaddr;
     env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index].attrs = attrs;
@@ -418,9 +428,19 @@ void tlb_set_page_with_attrs(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong 
vaddr,
         } else if (memory_region_is_ram(section->mr)
                    && cpu_physical_memory_is_clean(section->mr->ram_addr
                                                    + xlat)) {
-            te->addr_write = address | TLB_NOTDIRTY;
-        } else {
-            te->addr_write = address;
+            address |= TLB_NOTDIRTY;
+        }
+
+        /* Since the MMIO accesses follow always the slow path, we do not need
+         * to set any flag to trap the access */
+        if (!(address & TLB_MMIO)) {
+            if (cpu_physical_memory_is_excl(section->mr->ram_addr + xlat)) {
+                /* There is at least one vCPU that has flagged the address as
+                 * exclusive. */
+                te->addr_write = address | TLB_EXCL;
+            } else {
+                te->addr_write = address;
+            }
         }
     } else {
         te->addr_write = -1;
@@ -474,6 +494,24 @@ tb_page_addr_t get_page_addr_code(CPUArchState *env1, 
target_ulong addr)
     return qemu_ram_addr_from_host_nofail(p);
 }
 
+/* For every vCPU compare the exclusive address and reset it in case of a
+ * match. Since only one vCPU is running at once, no lock has to be held to
+ * guard this operation. */
+static inline void lookup_and_reset_cpus_ll_addr(hwaddr addr, hwaddr size)
+{
+    CPUState *cpu;
+
+    CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {
+        if (cpu->excl_protected_range.begin != EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR &&
+            ranges_overlap(cpu->excl_protected_range.begin,
+                           cpu->excl_protected_range.end -
+                           cpu->excl_protected_range.begin,
+                           addr, size)) {
+            cpu->excl_protected_range.begin = EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR;
+        }
+    }
+}
+
 #define MMUSUFFIX _mmu
 
 /* Generates LoadLink/StoreConditional helpers in softmmu_template.h */
diff --git a/softmmu_template.h b/softmmu_template.h
index 4332db2..267c52a 100644
--- a/softmmu_template.h
+++ b/softmmu_template.h
@@ -474,11 +474,43 @@ void helper_le_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong 
addr, DATA_TYPE val,
         tlb_addr = env->tlb_table[mmu_idx][index].addr_write;
     }
 
-    /* Handle an IO access.  */
+    /* Handle an IO access or exclusive access.  */
     if (unlikely(tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) {
-        glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_mmio_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
-                                                 mmu_idx, index, retaddr);
-        return;
+        if ((tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == TLB_EXCL) {
+            CPUIOTLBEntry *iotlbentry = &env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index];
+            CPUState *cpu = ENV_GET_CPU(env);
+            CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
+            /* The slow-path has been forced since we are writing to
+             * exclusive-protected memory. */
+            hwaddr hw_addr = (iotlbentry->addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) + addr;
+
+            /* The function lookup_and_reset_cpus_ll_addr could have reset the
+             * exclusive address. Fail the SC in this case.
+             * N.B.: here excl_succeed == true means that the caller is
+             * helper_stcond_name in softmmu_llsc_template.
+             * On the contrary, excl_succeeded == false occurs when a VCPU is
+             * writing through normal store to a page with TLB_EXCL bit set. */
+            if (cpu->excl_succeeded) {
+                if (!cc->cpu_valid_excl_access(cpu, hw_addr, DATA_SIZE)) {
+                    /* The vCPU is SC-ing to an unprotected address. */
+                    cpu->excl_protected_range.begin = EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR;
+                    cpu->excl_succeeded = false;
+
+                    return;
+                }
+            }
+
+            glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_ram_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
+                                                    mmu_idx, index, retaddr);
+
+            lookup_and_reset_cpus_ll_addr(hw_addr, DATA_SIZE);
+
+            return;
+        } else {
+            glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_mmio_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
+                                                     mmu_idx, index, retaddr);
+            return;
+        }
     }
 
     glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_ram_access)(env, val, addr, oi, mmu_idx, index,
@@ -586,11 +618,43 @@ void helper_be_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong 
addr, DATA_TYPE val,
         tlb_addr = env->tlb_table[mmu_idx][index].addr_write;
     }
 
-    /* Handle an IO access.  */
+    /* Handle an IO access or exclusive access.  */
     if (unlikely(tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) {
-        glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_mmio_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
-                                                 mmu_idx, index, retaddr);
-        return;
+        if ((tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == TLB_EXCL) {
+            CPUIOTLBEntry *iotlbentry = &env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index];
+            CPUState *cpu = ENV_GET_CPU(env);
+            CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
+            /* The slow-path has been forced since we are writing to
+             * exclusive-protected memory. */
+            hwaddr hw_addr = (iotlbentry->addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) + addr;
+
+            /* The function lookup_and_reset_cpus_ll_addr could have reset the
+             * exclusive address. Fail the SC in this case.
+             * N.B.: here excl_succeed == true means that the caller is
+             * helper_stcond_name in softmmu_llsc_template.
+             * On the contrary, excl_succeeded == false occurs when a VCPU is
+             * writing through normal store to a page with TLB_EXCL bit set. */
+            if (cpu->excl_succeeded) {
+                if (!cc->cpu_valid_excl_access(cpu, hw_addr, DATA_SIZE)) {
+                    /* The vCPU is SC-ing to an unprotected address. */
+                    cpu->excl_protected_range.begin = EXCLUSIVE_RESET_ADDR;
+                    cpu->excl_succeeded = false;
+
+                    return;
+                }
+            }
+
+            glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_ram_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
+                                                    mmu_idx, index, retaddr);
+
+            lookup_and_reset_cpus_ll_addr(hw_addr, DATA_SIZE);
+
+            return;
+        } else {
+            glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_mmio_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
+                                                     mmu_idx, index, retaddr);
+            return;
+        }
     }
 
     glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_ram_access)(env, val, addr, oi, mmu_idx, index,
-- 
2.7.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]