qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add all-match entry for qemu-devel


From: Stephen Warren
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add all-match entry for qemu-devel@
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:04:08 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1

On 02/08/2016 11:52 AM, John Snow wrote:


On 02/08/2016 04:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Stephen Warren <address@hidden> writes:

Add an entry to MAINTAINERS that matches every patch, and requests the
user send patches to address@hidden

It's not 100% obvious to project newcomers that all patches should be sent
there; checkpatch doesn't say so, and since it mentions other lists to CC,
the wording "the list" from the SubmitAPatch wiki page can be taken
to mean only those lists, not the main list too.

The F: entries were taken from a similar entry in the Linux kernel.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <address@hidden>
---
  MAINTAINERS | 5 +++++
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index b6ed87a26349..2d78eea5d62d 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ General Project Administration
  ------------------------------
  M: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>

+All patches CC here
+L: address@hidden
+F: *
+F: */
+
  Responsible Disclosure, Reporting Security Issues
  ------------------------------
  W: http://wiki.qemu.org/SecurityProcess

I acknowledge the problem, but your patch breaks the "No maintainers
found, printing recent contributors" functionality.

Before:

     $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f MAINTAINERS
     get_maintainer.pl: No maintainers found, printing recent contributors.
     get_maintainer.pl: Do not blindly cc: them on patches!  Use common sense.

     Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> (commit_signer:20/74=27%)
     Kevin Wolf <address@hidden> (commit_signer:13/74=18%)
     Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> (commit_signer:13/74=18%)
     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> (commit_signer:10/74=14%)
     Peter Maydell <address@hidden> (commit_signer:8/74=11%)

After:

     $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f MAINTAINERS
     address@hidden (open list:All patches CC here)


Agree ... Might this also break any "unmaintained" scripts we use?

How about:
  1) Update the wiki to be clearer on the submission process, and
  2) Update the "no contributors found" output to also include the list
to send to?

My case was that maintainers were found, but the list only included the maintainer (Peter) and the ARM list, but not the main qemu list. So (2) above wouldn't have solved my original issue.

qemu's get_maintainers.pl must be doing something different to the Linux kernel's version then, since IIRC the Linux kernel version always prints out recent contributors irrespective of whether maintainers were found, rather than as an alternative. I think if qemu's get_maintainers.pl acted in that way it would solve the problem my patch caused?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]