qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] "x-disable-pcie" virtio-pci property in compat_props (HW_CO


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: [Qemu-devel] "x-disable-pcie" virtio-pci property in compat_props (HW_COMPAT_2_4)
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:38:18 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0

Hi,

I'm playing with a qemu-2.5.0 and pc-i440fx-2.4 machine type, and
perhaps I don't understand correctly the compat_props machinery but
there is something strange for me:

in qemu-2.5.0, hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c:

   1880     DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-disable-pcie", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags,
   1881                     VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_DISABLE_PCIE_BIT, false),

So I guess a new default machine (pc-i440fx-2.5) will be defined by
default with "x-disable-pcie" set to "false".

and in qemu-2.5, include/hw/compat.h:

      3
      4 #define HW_COMPAT_2_4 \
      5         {\
..
     14             .driver   = "virtio-pci",\
     15             .property = "x-disable-pcie",\
     16             .value    = "on",\
     17         },{\

So I guess a new machine pc-i440fx-2.4 created with qemu-2.5.0 will have
"x-disable-pcie" set to true (as with qemu-2.4.0 this feature is not
available).

But in this case "x-disable-pcie" is always set to "false".

So the questions are:
- do I understand correctly?
- I check "x-disable-pcie" for "virtio-*-pci" devices (virtio-net-pci,
virtio-balloon-pci, ..."), should they inherit the behavior from their
parent "virtio-pci"? (they should, as virtio-pci is an abstract device type)

My test:

- take qemu-2.5.0 (a8c40fa Update version for v2.5.0 release)
- start it with "-M pc-i440fx-2.5 -device virtio-balloon-pci -S",
  "info qtree":

    bus: pci.0
      type PCI
      dev: virtio-balloon-pci, id ""
...
        x-disable-pcie = false

- start it with "-M pc-i440fx-2.4 -device virtio-balloon-pci -S",
  "info qtree":

    bus: pci.0
      type PCI
      dev: virtio-balloon-pci, id ""
...
        x-disable-pcie = false

Any explanation is very welcome.

Thanks,
Laurent




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]