qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] target-arm: Unmask PMU bits in debug fea


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] target-arm: Unmask PMU bits in debug feature register
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:43:26 +0000

On 6 February 2016 at 00:55, Alistair Francis
<address@hidden> wrote:
> The previously missing registers are now present in QEMU.

I think we're still missing some:

32 bit version present, 64 bit version missing:
PMSWINC
PMINTENSET

not implemented in 32 bit either:
PMOVSCLR (I think this is only in PMUv3 so needs care as to
          which CPUs we define it on)

> Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
> ---
>
>  target-arm/helper.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> index b4bf6fa..1775768 100644
> --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> @@ -4267,12 +4267,7 @@ void register_cp_regs_for_features(ARMCPU *cpu)
>              { .name = "ID_AA64DFR0_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
>                .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = 5, .opc2 = 0,
>                .access = PL1_R, .type = ARM_CP_CONST,
> -              /* We mask out the PMUVer field, because we don't currently
> -               * implement the PMU. Not advertising it prevents the guest
> -               * from trying to use it and getting UNDEFs on registers we
> -               * don't implement.
> -               */
> -              .resetvalue = cpu->id_aa64dfr0 & ~0xf00 },
> +              .resetvalue = cpu->id_aa64dfr0 },
>              { .name = "ID_AA64DFR1_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
>                .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = 5, .opc2 = 1,
>                .access = PL1_R, .type = ARM_CP_CONST,
> --
> 2.5.0
>

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]